The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

I meant that adding to another bandwagon would be a bad scum tactic, yes.

If their goal was to avoid attention D1 they could have just Not Done That without any sort of risk. If their goal was to further a D1 lynch, they would have picked either of the two wagons with 3 votes.

Palamedes, CB, Blazer opinions on this?

I'm reading it kind of like, town blind? This feels a bit too hardheaded and ignores obvious scenarios that scum would be more conscious of before they'd say anything.

Yeah, I think that's a fair read. Earlier today I was briefly wondering if Reyweld maybe-defending Numbers was worth looking at, but town blindness seems a lot more likely here. That BlazerC callout post there also reads as town to me.

For the record, my townread on Schazer was mostly based on their vote for Seedy in post #41, which I'm presuming was made with the same logic as my vote for them. (i.e. You can't break out of RVS until people actually have something of substance to talk about, and an early wagon fits the bill better than nothing.)

You think that holds with the followup votechange?

Kinda? The Seedy wagon was no longer in first place at that point, and moving your vote around is hardly the worst way to get out of RVS. My theory IS however undercut by Schazer continuing to shitpost rather than trying to make any other efforts to break out of the RVS funk. In fact, now they seem to be perfectly fine with it lasting all day, so yeah maybe I was too quick to read Schazer as town there.