The Wander Island Incident - Night Four - Five For One [13/21]

Both Airey and Acio were examples of 'throws down a vote and immediately slinks off again'. I'm not saying Airey and Acio also did this bad thing, but that the bad thing doesn't exist at all.

If Numbers wanted to support a bandwagon, they should have put their vote on one of the other 2 existing wagons with 3 votes on them, rather than bring another wagon to 3. As a potential scum tactic, it has only risk and no reward.

Far more likely is that these behaviors show nothing about Numbers and they were just making a joke.

Hey can you clarify this? It reads like you're saying that you think numbers puffing another bandwagon would have been a bad scum tactic? Or that supporting one of the larger ones would have?