Nostalgfia - GAME OVER SCUM WIN

if it’s n-o and they really can’t pick their targets that would be funny though.

*dog exudes a stunk cloud that spells out "if it's n-o then they probably just lied about that, as scum does. Seedy's logic has been tenuous several times now, and would vote for them rn if there were any votes on them and it wasnt so close to deadline*

which is why I used the word “if” which is conventually utilized in English to signify the subjunctive tense

I get not agreeing with some of my logic (honestly my post about bussing was...a mess and I posted it mostly because I felt like there were a couple interesting things I brought up rather than that the whole post was Perfect)
but it feels like you’re picking on extremely minor phrasing choices like “oh seedy didn’t qualify fully that all of n-o’s statements could be lies when commenting that such a role would be funny, that means they must believe them fully and are defending n-o” or “seedy said that all the lynches today are hardly any better than n-o, that means all the lynches are equally bad so they don’t have any excuse to not vote n-o”
it feels like it’s less about I’m actually saying or that anything I said is actually scummy and more about taking me to task for simple wording “mistakes” that you can re-interpret
it’s kind of annoying and unfun?