RE: Irregular Pulse
06-26-2018, 05:01 PM
Show Content
Thoughts
When this started, I honestly had no idea how far off-rails this was going to go. Kept thinking, maybe this suggestion would be the step too far and i'd have to tone it down a bit. Never really happened though, and I just kept going fullspeed into full-form surrealism. Usually I get tempered with other, more reasonable/coherent suggestions to keep it sensible or otherwise have soomething to bounce off, but that uh. Didn't really happen, huh? That one's on me for reading the initial tone really off the mark.
Can't say I'm entirely happy with how I handled the RBS-012844/RBS-000005 conversation either. It was fun, and you rolled pretty well with what I kept coming up with. Or, at least, gave me a decent impression that was the case. But my introducing new concepts one after the other in such a short span of time didn't really give room for any of them to properly develop. I mean, I do have more on the various terms/concepts, I just should've fit their explanations better (or at all) in the messages bringing them up.
Can't deny I was running more on passion than reason, if that makes sense. Had the drive, the enthusiasm to participate in this adventure, but not the sensibility to slow down and think for a minute about what I was actually doing. Made for interesting writing on my part, but not necessarily good writing. Too much telling, not enough showing the hows or whys behind them.
In the end, while I can't say I'm entirely happy with my actions, I do feel the journey was one worth taking; if only for providing experience for future writing endeavors.
...Oh, right. I said I had explanations for what I was on about, and I do.
If there's specific questions you or anyone else have, I'll do my best to answer (most) of them in as clear a manner as possible. A few details benefit from being vague and shrouded in a surreal/mysterious fog, but most of them could use a clear answer. Particularly in regards to my tendancy towards introducing terms without actually explaining what those terms mean. For that I'll try to get my notes/thoughts organized into something reasonably comprehensive+coherent for future reference. And for discussion on what should be kept+used, changed, or outright cut.
When this started, I honestly had no idea how far off-rails this was going to go. Kept thinking, maybe this suggestion would be the step too far and i'd have to tone it down a bit. Never really happened though, and I just kept going fullspeed into full-form surrealism. Usually I get tempered with other, more reasonable/coherent suggestions to keep it sensible or otherwise have soomething to bounce off, but that uh. Didn't really happen, huh? That one's on me for reading the initial tone really off the mark.
Can't say I'm entirely happy with how I handled the RBS-012844/RBS-000005 conversation either. It was fun, and you rolled pretty well with what I kept coming up with. Or, at least, gave me a decent impression that was the case. But my introducing new concepts one after the other in such a short span of time didn't really give room for any of them to properly develop. I mean, I do have more on the various terms/concepts, I just should've fit their explanations better (or at all) in the messages bringing them up.
Can't deny I was running more on passion than reason, if that makes sense. Had the drive, the enthusiasm to participate in this adventure, but not the sensibility to slow down and think for a minute about what I was actually doing. Made for interesting writing on my part, but not necessarily good writing. Too much telling, not enough showing the hows or whys behind them.
In the end, while I can't say I'm entirely happy with my actions, I do feel the journey was one worth taking; if only for providing experience for future writing endeavors.
...Oh, right. I said I had explanations for what I was on about, and I do.
If there's specific questions you or anyone else have, I'll do my best to answer (most) of them in as clear a manner as possible. A few details benefit from being vague and shrouded in a surreal/mysterious fog, but most of them could use a clear answer. Particularly in regards to my tendancy towards introducing terms without actually explaining what those terms mean. For that I'll try to get my notes/thoughts organized into something reasonably comprehensive+coherent for future reference. And for discussion on what should be kept+used, changed, or outright cut.
Quiet. Good for an unusual opinion. Doesn't talk much.