Nostalgfia - GAME OVER SCUM WIN

I think that's six on CSJ, more than enough for soft lynch. No more please.

As seedy Mirdini just said, we'd need 10 votes to end the day, so we're nowhere near losing time. Votes are Extremely Good for reading players after a role flip, and discouraging 'em could discourage discussion and some of Town's best information for scum-hunting. So yeah, I don't like discouraging votes at this point, but if peeps feel the same way and don't vote for safety's sake, please At Least state your intent to do so.

---

We also haven't had a ton of unique items, I mean three or four people have claimed antidote so far if I'm remembering correctly.

Feel free to point out where you saw 4 antidotes; I see 2 now, but prior to review I only saw claims of 1 antidote, 1 apple, 1 spring, 1 gun, 1 scope, 1 bone, etc. Second item claims so far are awkwardcarapace claiming Antidote after Robottobot, CSJ claiming Recipe Book after Schazer, and Pharmacy claiming Toilet Paper Tube after I did.

Sunspider where am I doubting my own reads? And where am I only focusing on you? I mean, if I had tunnel vision on anyone today it was on Robo :S.

Let's see, where to start...

I'm torn.

Part of me is wondering if this exchange is a little forced because of specific weird details, and the other part of me feels like it doesn't seem that way? Regardless I really don't like how you're being so pushy for frankly irrelevant details Sunspider, why was it such a big deal to get that info from CSJ?

Literally saying: "This exchange looks forced, but also it doesn't. I don't feel confident you're scum anymore, but but I'm going to keep voting to kill you anyway." Also, feel free to tally up posts mentioning Robo if you like, but just a quick synopsis of your tunneling, which I've entitled "Why do you want me to die so badly, Pal?"

Show Content

DAY 1

Jeez sorry/Vote: Sunspider I was busy/forgot for a day or two. Why aren't you voting for apologizers/absentees/dogpilers/actual dogs?

NOTE: Your first post was an OMGUS on me for calling you out on being silent. Your suspicion was based on me not doing something I was literally doing. You corrected yourself later, but kept the vote.

---

Also seriously Sunspider seems way too eager to please which while not entirely damning is a hell of a lot better a reason to kill.

I mean the post I first addressed was a bunch of shade without any push towards everything so I threw a vote that way (I'll admit I missed the Wheat vote but I'll get to that later) but after some other people and I questioned him suddenly it's entirely going on the defensive.

Re: the Wheat vote Sunspider, you say you voted as a defense but also you didn't want to lynch him so...? And now here we are, with a couple posts that make me feel like you're going to blame other people for convincing you to go ahead and lynch the dog.

NOTE: You twisted my answer and ignored my stated reasons for my vote. You now decide you're voting me for "something you feel like I'm going to do later on", which is possibly the worst argument I've heard all game. Do you realize that this has no bearing on my actions, and could be used that to justify literally anything?

---

Sunspider I'm not saying that anyone argued you into voting Wheat, in case that's not clear, I'm saying that it seems like you were intentionally avoiding jumping on him despite everything you were saying otherwise with a pretty eh reason and then as soon as you had an excuse from someone else you were immediately there, so it wouldn't entirely be your fault when he died. It is also okay to correct yourself! What's getting me is that it feels like your whole thing has been defending yourself and going for the one other person that you had both mentioned and was getting real attention/votes. I dont know if it's a coincidence.

NOTE: You backpeddle from your garbage argument earlier, and push the goalposts to something else. Again, you either misunderstood or ignored my explained reasons for voting, and call me out for answering your questions, and for "defending myself" when I was tied to be lynched. I've said it before and I'll say it again, but guess what; it's pro-town to defend yourself against baseless or bad votes, as well as to prevent your teammates from lynching you.

---

I personally would like you to give your opinion on the goings on? Thoughts on the dog, Sunspider, then maybe two or three other active people and maybe who you think looks the best/worst so far.

Show Content

DAY 2:

I'm hoping maybe you can weigh in on some of the more divisive people from yesterday (Sunspider, Wheat, anyone else you might have noticed acting strange)

---

Proper suspicions would be CSJ, Sunspider, and most of the people who are just piling on more active players' votes without reason

NOTE: I never haven't had a stated reason for a vote, but nice attempt to group me with those people I guess?

---

Oh right, and I don't like Sunspider's theorycrafting post on the CSJ/granola scumteam

NOTE: I cited a common scum tactic, and you didn't like that I mentioned it, and again tried to use it to make me look bad.

---

Day one I said I wanted to lynch CSJ for the terrible pressure on Robo and some parts of the Sunspider debacle. That's what I was referring to there.

NOTE: What even is "the Sunspider Debacle?" The ever-changing lynch justifications you keep pushing on me?

---

Part of me is wondering if this exchange is a little forced because of specific weird details, and the other part of me feels like it doesn't seem that way? Regardless I really don't like how you're being so pushy for frankly irrelevant details Sunspider, why was it such a big deal to get that info from CSJ?

I don't really like votes with nothing stated behind them. I mean I think I straight up said that I felt iffy about the CSJ/Sunspider exchange so I can guess why Schazer voted, but not saying anything means that you can just copy someone else's reason later down the line.

-snip-

All in all it's enough to tip me a little bit more towards a Vote: Sunspider for now

NOTE: I press a question to CSJ, they flail and act suspicious, and you argue against their lynch and vote to lynch me instead.