Nostalgfia - GAME OVER SCUM WIN

I mean the post I first addressed was a bunch of shade without any push towards everything so I threw a vote that way (I'll admit I missed the Wheat vote but I'll get to that later) but after some other people and I questioned him suddenly it's entirely going on the defensive.

Re: the Wheat vote Sunspider, you say you voted as a defense but also you didn't want to lynch him so...? And now here we are, with a couple posts that make me feel like you're going to blame other people for convincing you to go ahead and lynch the dog.

I didn't vote as a defense? Where's this coming from? I random-voted before Wheat had posted. They then proceeded to only bark and pee on things, so I threatened to keep it on them as pressure, while I ask some questions to figure out whether this was a post restriction thing (thus a bad reason for a lynch on it's own), or just Wheat being as unhelpful as possible (A better reason).

Also, no one "convinced me to do" anything, but they did help me realize I was overlooking the obvious by assuming too much about Wheat's response and unvoting; that they actually were just being obtuse, and weren't answering all my questions as true. Which brought me back to "Wheat is being as intentionally unhelpful as possible", and thus worthy of a lynch. More on this later.

Also also, if I'm tied to be lynched, mostly by single-post random voters who then vanish into silence, I'm going to A) call those people out and 2) otherwise defend against being killed. Why should I want to die, and not defend myself? That aside, if I realize I misread Wheat and was being dumb, are you saying I shouldn't have corrected my mistake, and instead should've doubled down? I know "conviction" looks good to people's lizard brains, but sometimes it's good to recognize when you messed up and not be a dummy.

Sunspider, could you explain your thought process for voting Wheat? Because as far as I can tell you've gone back and forth between "Wheat's barking is a jester thing" and "Wheat's barking is a lurker thing", which are both pretty bullshit IMO.

Who ever said Wheat was a Lurker? Where is this coming from too? And can you tell me when I said that? Heck, I've explicitly said the opposite: it's the two most Active Players who've garnered the most soon-to-be-lynched-ness, and mainly by random votes from people who then vanish, and votes with no reasons behind them which are bandwagoning on those random votes.

Also, unlike your vote on me, my vote wasn't a bandwagon; I was the first, and I presented my reasons (if you're uncertain on them still, see above paragraph please). In a nutshell, Wheat's extremely active "Just Dog Things" was them being Actively Unhelpful, and contrary to anyone trying to play the game, which isn't pro-town in my book. That said, they're starting to try to say things despite maintaining the dog thing. Vote's staying put while I think, but I'm going to go on re-considering my angry re-vote last night.

But hey, while I've got your attention you dang ectotherm. You've kept a random-vote (and a bandwagon vote literally right after Pharms' vote) on me, for using the word Cold-Blooded. Now, you're trying to make me look bad and get me killed for things I never did or said. You've tunnel-visioned on me, and your every post has been about me, with next-to-zero regard for anything else happening.

Show Content

Literally all of your posts:

Please don't use the word "Coldblooded" as a pejorative. Ectotherms are perfect and beautiful in their own way and deserve better than to be unfairly painted as killers by a bunch of war-mongering, nuke hoarding, murder mammals.

Vote Sunspider

Sunspider, what exactly do you have against dogpile voters and which of the current votes out there do you like the least right now?

This would be the point where I'd start voting for "D1 bandwagons are bad except for when I do it" Sunspider, except that my vote was already on her.

What's up with that?