RE: Nostalgfia Day 1 - I don't know the meaning of the word!
05-02-2018, 01:15 AM
I'm against a Day 1 Wheat vote, assuming what they were trying to say was that this just-dog-things limitation wears off after Day 1. Also, I'm a little bit worried Wheat may be a Jester role that's TRYING to get lynched to end the game. I want to know more about the sitch first, but I'm down for a Day 2+ lynch, if Wheat basically can't participate in the discussion or day game.
Apart from the above stuff? I don't like the bandwagon on me. Especially Palamedes' reactionary "oh my gosh you suck" bandwagon vote, presumably inspired by me calling them out for lurking. It is Pretty Garbagey on 3 fronts. If I get lynched for being active, trying to start getting reads on peeps, and otherwise playing the game, I'mma be A Bit Miffed.
Current bandwagons are on active players, seemingly just because they're active. Meanwhile said bandwagoners are just voting to make sure someone dies (without even a basic suspicion or reason offered), and people are lurking in the BG without votes or comments, and a few remaining absentee players are getting a free pass for their shenanigans. I am also a bit miffed about all this. >:I
Actually, I already was. Check back, and you'll see I Voted Wheat to pressure 'em into responding and explaining the dog thing. I unvoted after I got a response and (like I said at the top) started to get a sense for what's going on there enough to worry about a Jester play.
After work tonight, going to reread and find my best candidate for a legit vote. This is all I got time for for now.
(05-01-2018, 12:27 PM)Coldblooded Wrote: »Sunspider, what exactly do you have against dogpile voters and which of the current votes out there do you like the least right now?
Apart from the above stuff? I don't like the bandwagon on me. Especially Palamedes' reactionary "oh my gosh you suck" bandwagon vote, presumably inspired by me calling them out for lurking. It is Pretty Garbagey on 3 fronts. If I get lynched for being active, trying to start getting reads on peeps, and otherwise playing the game, I'mma be A Bit Miffed.
Current bandwagons are on active players, seemingly just because they're active. Meanwhile said bandwagoners are just voting to make sure someone dies (without even a basic suspicion or reason offered), and people are lurking in the BG without votes or comments, and a few remaining absentee players are getting a free pass for their shenanigans. I am also a bit miffed about all this. >:I
(05-01-2018, 03:36 AM)Palamedes Wrote: »Why aren't you voting for apologizers/absentees/dogpilers/actual dogs?
Actually, I already was. Check back, and you'll see I Voted Wheat to pressure 'em into responding and explaining the dog thing. I unvoted after I got a response and (like I said at the top) started to get a sense for what's going on there enough to worry about a Jester play.
After work tonight, going to reread and find my best candidate for a legit vote. This is all I got time for for now.