RE: +iny ©at people
12-28-2017, 08:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-28-2017, 08:30 PM by Jacquerel.)
(12-28-2017, 08:15 PM)Dark Lord Graham Wrote: »(12-28-2017, 07:10 PM)Jacquerel Wrote: »We aren't trying to cause trouble here but this is a very specific rule nobody told us about and I don't see why creating an completely useless object is such a crime.
It is a rule we were told about already.
Willful ignorance is not an excuse. At least take responsibility for your mistake.
It's not though.
We were told that "some actions cause admin intervention".
We weren't told what those actions were, so had no means to avoid doing it apart from not trying to make the same object we did before.
The idea we were warned about in the past was to give the cats a knife that could kill a god, not one in our personal zone, which is something we were allowed to do before with no warning or difficulty. The fact that admin intervention could occur isn't a surprise, the fact that this specifically (creating a prank object bound to ourselves, which even Wax has stated is basically completely useless) caused it to happen is.
It's clear that this was triggered by a very specific type of action that we could easily have been informed about, but weren't. We have never been warned against "the creation of magical items bound to a specific entity" at all, at best we got a vague warning that "some things are things we shouldn't do" and were also provided with an expectation that we'd be warned before crossing those lines.
Wax should take responsibility for their actions too. If there are such easily delineated automatic responses and they are invested in those not being triggered, it's probably a good idea to tell people what they are.