RE: The Ballad of Adler Young, Canto 2.5
03-13-2017, 10:03 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-13-2017, 10:04 PM by smuchmuch.)
>Kind judge estmere: you said no more vixens and she's bringing the two SALVS on the stand, your patience with the prosecussion is starting to thin
>Also do /not want to think naked SALVs. You are only into ungulates, as is well known.
>Defense: even if (IF) those SALVs were druged inthe first place, there's no proof Addler was reqpoànsible, this is at best conjecture.
(Which elves can do, as it's technicaly not a lie, but they really shouldn't.)
> So far the prosecution has prooved nothing,nada, zielch.
While Addler may have been caught with a few dubious objects comming out of the SALV office, none of is determinant by itself.
>Also do /not want to think naked SALVs. You are only into ungulates, as is well known.
>Defense: even if (IF) those SALVs were druged inthe first place, there's no proof Addler was reqpoànsible, this is at best conjecture.
(Which elves can do, as it's technicaly not a lie, but they really shouldn't.)
> So far the prosecution has prooved nothing,nada, zielch.
While Addler may have been caught with a few dubious objects comming out of the SALV office, none of is determinant by itself.