RE: Text You Up -- Eagle Time Edition [R1 Start!]
10-21-2016, 06:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-21-2016, 06:53 AM by Truegreen.)
More the problem, a52, with your answer and Kaynato is that they offer no information on the subject of the question that spawned them.
They are non-committal answers. Almost any question could have created them.
Let's examine the differences though.
papers says "i" Unusual certainly. Worthy of suspicion, but could just be referential to self obsession? Could also be the result of a tricky faker question. Eyes on you papers.
Kaynato says "This is real difficult. I don't know if I had one." Which seems to address the question directly but is still too noncommittal to be reasonably certain of its veracity.
a52 says "None (sorry)" Which is quite generic. Oddly 'None' implies a plural whereas the real question requests a singular element. I can see this as being a simple mistake, but it does seem somewhat more suspicious than Kaynato's answer.
In any case I think we can narrow our suspicions to and a52 as the most likely offenders.
(Also, a minor digression. I think we should refrain from addressing specific elements of the questions this early. It's my worry that they might help the faker defend their answer more effectively.)
They are non-committal answers. Almost any question could have created them.
Let's examine the differences though.
papers says "i" Unusual certainly. Worthy of suspicion, but could just be referential to self obsession? Could also be the result of a tricky faker question. Eyes on you papers.
Kaynato says "This is real difficult. I don't know if I had one." Which seems to address the question directly but is still too noncommittal to be reasonably certain of its veracity.
a52 says "None (sorry)" Which is quite generic. Oddly 'None' implies a plural whereas the real question requests a singular element. I can see this as being a simple mistake, but it does seem somewhat more suspicious than Kaynato's answer.
In any case I think we can narrow our suspicions to and a52 as the most likely offenders.
(Also, a minor digression. I think we should refrain from addressing specific elements of the questions this early. It's my worry that they might help the faker defend their answer more effectively.)