RE: Accelerating DECK-struction II: The Rise of Sleepy [Sign-ups Closed]
09-17-2016, 06:29 PM
i think there's a lot of completely unstated assumptions in the rules that desperately need clarified. like, i asked sleepy and those (x1)s next to the cards do not indicate finite amount, but probability from an infinite deck, which is definitely counter-intuitive even though it makes sense for us not to like, run out of cards. is there an expanded version of the rules somewhere?