Lucidstuck I

I'm relatively sure that this method, however sugar-coated, is doing the same thing: ending a monster's existence, rewarding the offender with a soul. This method happens to require the monster's consent, but is still murder, no matter how many burdens you've lifted off the poor soul's chest. I'd rather live as a horrible abomination than be exorcised into nonexistence, neither would I want to be sentenced to death for the statistical value of my "drops". This exorcism thing just kind of rubs me the wrong way, especially taking into account my beliefs (or lack thereof, just to clarify)

EITHER WAY...
>actually, let's go hunt down Sharkbite, deliver the good news (exorcism)!

The monsters, on the other hand, do not possess the same opinion, so we might as well give them what they deserve. (a polite denial of their continued existence)

(woah wait did I just provide a meaningful point? Probably not, but at least something that I felt minorly passionate about popped up so I could add my two sense)(get it? cuz I ruined the pun?)

Lets not try to get into the morality of this. Both because arguing morality tends to not really go well and because people will probably have different opinions on whether to live in what is practically Hell or to move on to an ambiguous fate.