RE: Exactly the same as Dragon Fogel's post but I'm changing the title WHOA
05-02-2016, 09:39 PM
(05-02-2016, 09:20 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »buckle up buDDy we're taking this mother fucker straight to the top
This post breaks every rule!
(05-02-2016, 09:32 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think? Are any of Akumu's rules simple exclusive or simple inclusive? How would you categorize some of the other possible rules?"
"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I'm pretty sure this post will pass them."
"At a glance 4 seems to be simple exclusive, as blank posts pass it. However, combining posts that pass it has produced posts that don't."
"We had a theory on 2 that would be simple inclusive but it isn't working consistently buddy."
This post breaks rule 4.
(05-02-2016, 09:36 PM)CrimsonMage Wrote: »(05-02-2016, 05:23 PM)btp Wrote: »"What do you guys think? Are any of Akumu's rules simple exclusive or simple inclusive? How would you categorize some of the other possible rules?"
"1 and 5 seem to be simple inclusive, and I'm pretty sure this post will pass them."
"At a glance 4 seems to be simple exclusive, as blank posts pass it. However, combining posts that pass it has produced posts that don't."
"We had a theory on 2 that would be simple inclusive but it isn't working consistently."
This post breaks rule 4.