Post making contest 1.0

I think having a question mark in a quote box breaks Rule 4. I don't claim to understand how.

?

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.

Hey now, if you didn't want to read the same analysis post over and over then you shouldn't have declared it the least rule-breaky in the thread

Show Content

Spoiler

#125

#144

#147

#154

#157

#160

Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?

Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.

Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.

This post violates rules 4 and 5.

I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.

This violated 1 and 4.

Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.

This post violates rules 1 and 4.

Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.

All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.

Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?

This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.

Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.

These are the posts, to be more specific:

https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286

This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

This post violates rule 4 and I have just discovered that you have in fact been changing the contents of these spoilers so you can completely disregard all judgements I have made on rule 5 for your posts. I will go back and check them if I can, but subsequent judgements will be aided massively if you leave all copies of #201 unaltered.

I think having a question mark in a quote box breaks Rule 4? I don't claim to understand how.

?

Nah I got away with it in #214

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.

I think having a question mark in a quote box breaks Rule 4. I don't claim to understand how.

Here is Post 199 again with all question marks removed.

Show Content

Spoiler

#125

#144

Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert

#147

Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert

&

#154

#157

Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!

#160

g0m Sruixan

Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number

Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.

Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.

This post violates rules 4 and 5.

I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.

This violated 1 and 2.

This violated 1 and 4.

Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.

This post violates rules 1 and 4.

Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.

All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.

Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?

This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.

Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.

These are the posts, to be more specific:

https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?ti...#pid123286

This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

?

I REGRET RULE 5.

...this post violates rule 4.

May we indicate whether or not we've edited 199/201 at the bottom of our post without it applying to rule breakage?

If it's in the post, I'm (supposedly) counting it. Except when people start editing spoilered posts at 3am and I make time-saving assumptions...

...this post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.