IRC highlights!

Wheat, you sexual beast, you have fallen into my trap!

Despite your knowledge of geologic erogenous zones, you have giftwrapped and delivered the exact evidence needed to prove that the 6 and 9's are indeed stick figure positions and you have carelessly discarded the one weapon you held for your cause.

For you see, there was a fundamental flaw in my proclamation that the circles were the heads and the dangly bits were the legs:

6 legs do not bend that way 9

However, in your defense of the circle-torso theorem you stated:

the lower half of at least one person is often bendy or curled so as to give space

In order to give that space, the legs must bend back towards the person which reveals that the furthest most point of the "6" or "9" is not the base of the body, but the bent KNEES of an enraptured lover.

In your interpretation of 69 the line of the "head" would be reaching for the succulent knees of their partner. While I do hate to disappoint, some cursory research reveals that knees, while enticing, are not the face bound goal of our position.

But what about the proof of the "circle-parts-are-heads" theory? I direct you to the very evidence you just presented:

Show Content

Spoiler
No, you are not.

In your own representation, where is the mouth?

Now...where does that line up in our contentious number?

69

It lines up with the juncture of the base of the circle and the start of the dangle bit.

And what could be there I wonder? We have seen this before. Humanity has seen this before.

The Lascaux Birdman

A 17,000 year old painting of a man with an EAGLE'S HEAD and PROMINENT JUNK protruding from the juncture of circle and line.

In number "69", the circle parts are the head and the dingly parts are the bent legs, with the junk just at the base of the circle.

deathnote.gif