RE: What ARE birds
04-14-2016, 03:11 AM
It was more like,
In an attempt to ask gatrs question in a "are ______ birds?" format I figured
If there was a name-basis to what birds are, similar to schazer's birds, then all organisms that were birds would share an exclusive trait, but if birds are not determined by a characteristic of their names then there is no such thing as a taxonomic trait exclusive to birds and thus there are no organisms that fit the given description - hence them not being birds.
But it could be said that the exclusive taxonomic trait is that they all belong to a list of names of names of the given organisms - hence the extra caveat.
But also by that point I realized I was getting too far away from the spirit of bird-game and too close to playing Nomic.
Are
birds?
Are
birds?
Are roses birds?
Are sunflowers birds?
Are fungi that are not mushrooms birds?
In an attempt to ask gatrs question in a "are ______ birds?" format I figured
If there was a name-basis to what birds are, similar to schazer's birds, then all organisms that were birds would share an exclusive trait, but if birds are not determined by a characteristic of their names then there is no such thing as a taxonomic trait exclusive to birds and thus there are no organisms that fit the given description - hence them not being birds.
But it could be said that the exclusive taxonomic trait is that they all belong to a list of names of names of the given organisms - hence the extra caveat.
But also by that point I realized I was getting too far away from the spirit of bird-game and too close to playing Nomic.
Are
![Fact Seagull Fact Seagull](https://eagle-time.org/images/smilies/factseagull.gif)
Are
![Trog Demands Blood! Trog Demands Blood!](https://eagle-time.org/images/smilies/soctopus.png)
Are roses birds?
Are sunflowers birds?
Are fungi that are not mushrooms birds?