QUITE EAGLENESTING

I think I had a problem with the fact that it wasn't really... questions with concrete answers that we could get wrong. I mean, QI sure uses clever wordplay to goad a forfeit out of the panelists sometimes, but it generally doesn't revolve the entire show around it and more often than no the forfeits come from straight up incorrect answers. They don't buzz people for having the correct answer, even if it's not the interesting answer. So yes, if text is a tool used to create text adventures, as you say, it's not wrong and not really meriting a forfeit.

I stated at the beginning what the forfeits were gonna have to end up being to compensate for the fact that this is a forum game, with time to think and time to google. So I won't take any flack on that. None whatsoever, take your flack back sir. I will haunt you until you take it back, and trust me I can do a good haunting.

But no, you're right in that it hurts the game, and really, there's a lot of problems here and QI just doesn't work as a forum game.

So we're probably done here, it was an experiment, it didn't work, now we know. And it was pretty fun for what it was, you are all funny, interesting people!

BUT STAY TUNED

I like hosting things, and I am chill enough to be a good host when I'm not feeling the need to compensate for a game's FAULTS COMING FROM THE MEDIUM. So I'll probably figure out another game to do soon enough. And then we can all have cake and ice cream and BANTER CHWOKA YOU CAN HAVE YOUR GOSH DANG BANTER