Post making contest 2.0 - Printable Version +- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org) +-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Forum: Adventures and Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30) +---- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Thread: Post making contest 2.0 (/showthread.php?tid=2050) |
RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 12:47 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4, and 5. I'd totally just give you a pass here but what if someone just said 'pretend i passed rule 4?' what kind of precedent would i be setting? Sruix, pretend Akumu passed rule 4. g0m RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 05-29-2016 RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 01:09 AM)Akumu Wrote: » This post breaks rules 1 and 2. (05-29-2016, 01:10 AM)Wheat Wrote: »Pup This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 01:10 AM)Wheat Wrote: » This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 01:10 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »(05-29-2016, 12:47 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4, and 5. I'd totally just give you a pass here but what if someone just said 'pretend i passed rule 4?' what kind of precedent would i be setting? This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. (05-29-2016, 01:11 AM)Wheat Wrote: » This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5 (dogs not weird enough). (05-29-2016, 01:13 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » This post breaks rules 1 and 4. I'd say so yeah, but not that that relates to the rules in any way of course. RE: Post making contest - Kíeros - 05-29-2016 (05-28-2016, 09:41 PM)Akumu Wrote: »Known good rule five letter distributions:A list of better rule 5 distributions, because they can also pass rule 3: [23=314159] 10,2,3 10,1,2,0,1 11,2,1,0,1 12,4,1 [25=3141592] 12,5,1 12,1,0,1,0,0,1 [31=31415926] 10,3,2,1,1 [61=3141592653589] 5,6,3,0,3,1,2 RE: Post making contest - Akumu - 05-29-2016 Kieros do you know the rule five secret? RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 01:30 AM)Kíeros Wrote: »(05-28-2016, 09:41 PM)Akumu Wrote: »Known good rule five letter distributions:A list of better rule 5 distributions, because they can also pass rule 3: This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 01:34 AM)Akumu Wrote: »Kieros do you know the rule five secret? This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. I don't know why you're still talking about that old done and dusted ruleset though. Just let it go! RE: Post making contest - Kaynato - 05-29-2016 Subject : MR SULEMAN BELLO FROM THE OFFICE MR SULEMAN BELLO AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (ADB). OUAGADOUGOU BURKINA FASO. WEST AFRICA. TRANSFER OF ($ 25,200.000.00) TWENTY FIVE MILLION, TWO HUNDREN THOUSAND DOLLARS. I AM SULEMAN BELLO, THE AUDITOR GENERAL OF AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK HERE IN BURKINA FASO. DURING THE COURSE OF OUR AUDITING, I DISCOVERED A FLOATING FUND IN AN ACCOUNT OPENED IN THE BANK BY MR JOHN KOROVO AND AFTER GOING THROUGH SOME OLD FILES IN THE RECORDS I DISCOVERED THAT THE OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT DIED IN THE (BEIRUT-BOUND CHARTER JET) PLANE CRASH ON THE 25TH DECEMBER 2003 IN COTONOU (REPUBLIC OF BENIN). AND NOBODY HAS OPERATED ON THIS ACCOUNT AGAIN, THE OWNER OF THIS ACCOUNT IS MR JOHN KOROVO A FOREIGNER, AND A TRADER WHO TRADE ON GOLD AND MINING, HE DIED, SINCE 2003 AND NO OTHER PERSON KNOWS ABOUT THIS ACCOUNT OR ANY THING CONCERNING IT, THE ACCOUNT HAS NO OTHER BENEFICIARY AND MY INVESTIGATION PROVED TO ME AS WELL THAT MR JOHN KOROVO DIE ALONG WITH HIS TIRED FAMILY. THE AMOUNT INVOLVED IS (USD 25.2 M) TWENTY-FIVE MILLION, TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND UNITED STATES DOLLARS ONLY , I AM CONTACTING YOU AS A FOREIGNER BECAUSE THIS MONEY CAN NOT BE APPROVED TO A LOCAL PERSON HERE, BUT CAN ONLY BE APPROVED TO ANY FOREIGNER WITH VALID INTERNATIONAL PASSPORT OR DRIVERS LICENSE AND FOREIGN ACCOUNT BECAUSE THE MONEY IS IN US DOLLARS AND THE FORMER OWNER OF THE ACCOUNT MR JOHN KOROVO IS A FOREIGNER TOO, AND THE MONEY CAN ONLY BE APPROVED INTO A FOREIGN ACCOUNT. I NEED YOUR STRONG ASSURANCE THAT YOU WILL NEVER, NEVER CHEAT ME AS SOON AS THIS FUND HIT INTO YOUR ACCOUNT. WITH MY INFLUENCE AND THE POSITION OF THE BANK OFFICIAL WE CAN TRANSFER THIS MONEY TO ANY FOREIGNER'S RELIABLE ACCOUNT WHICH YOU CAN PROVIDE WITH ASSURANCE THAT THIS MONEY WILL BE INTACT PENDING OUR PHYSICAL ARRIVAL IN YOUR COUNTRY FOR SHARING. THE BANK OFFICIAL WILL PROVE ALL DOCUMENTS OF TRANSACTION IMMEDIATELY FOR YOU TO RECEIVE THIS FUND LEAVING NO TRACE TO ANY PLACE AND TO BUILD CONFIDENCE. ON THE CONCLUSION OF THIS TRANSACTION YOU WILL BE ENTITLED TO 30% OF THE TOTAL SUM AS GRATIFICATION, WHILE 10% WILL BE SET ASIDE TO TAKE CARE OF THEEXPENSES THAT MAY ARISE DURING THE TIME OF TRANSFER AND ALSO TELEPHONE BILLS, WHILE 60% WILL BE FOR ME. SO ON THE INDICATION OF YOUR WILLINGNESS I WANT YOU TO FORWARD TO ME YOUR :FULL NAME: SEX: COMPANY: IF ANY FULL CONTACT ADDRESS: PHONE: CELL: FAX: CITY: STATE:ZIP CODE COUNTRY: OCCUPATION AND ALL THE NECESSARYINFORMATION WILL BE SENT TO YOU ON THE ACCEPTANCE TO CHAMPION THIS TRANSACTION WITH ME. THANKS YOURS TRULY SULEMAN BELLO RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 01:46 AM)Kaynato Wrote: »Subject : MR SULEMAN BELLO This post sounds like a great deal but breaks rules 1, 3, 4 (surprisingly) and 5. RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 02:09 AM)Wheat Wrote: »A clause then another clause This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 02:09 AM)Wheat Wrote: »A clause, then another clause This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4, and 5. (05-29-2016, 02:15 AM)Wheat Wrote: » This post breaks rules 1, 3, and 4. By the way this post passes rule 4 and so does, not the last judgement post, but the one before it. Come on guys, you can solve this! RE: Post making contest - Akumu - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 01:30 AM)Kíeros Wrote: »(05-28-2016, 09:41 PM)Akumu Wrote: »Known good rule five letter distributions:A list of better rule 5 distributions, because they can also pass rule 3: (05-29-2016, 02:28 AM)Wheat Wrote: »Come on guys, you can solve this! RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 02:28 AM)Wheat Wrote: »This post passes rule 4 and so does, not the last judgement post, but the one before it. This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 02:28 AM)Wheat Wrote: »Come on guys, you can solve this! This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 02:30 AM)Akumu Wrote: »(05-29-2016, 01:30 AM)Kíeros Wrote: »(05-28-2016, 09:41 PM)Akumu Wrote: »Known good rule five letter distributions:A list of better rule 5 distributions, because they can also pass rule 3: This post breaks rule 1, 2 and 4. RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 02:52 AM)Wheat Wrote: »By the way this post passes rule 4 and so does, not the last judgement post, but the one before it. Come on guys, you can solve this! This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. RE: Post making contest - Akumu - 05-29-2016 4444 RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 02:55 AM)Akumu Wrote: »4444 How about another clue? I'm gonna pass rule four with this post. Get ready for this hot rule four pass! RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 05-29-2016 RE: Post making contest - Akumu - 05-29-2016 This is the first sentence? This is the second sentence. This is the third sentence! RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 03:06 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »(05-29-2016, 02:55 AM)Akumu Wrote: »4444 This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3 and 5. (05-29-2016, 03:13 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » This post breaks rules 1 and 4 and contains a frankly alarming number of weird dogs. (05-29-2016, 03:17 AM)Akumu Wrote: »This is the first sentence? This is the second sentence. This is the third sentence! This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. You're getting closer though, though not in the way I think you're thinking. RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 05-29-2016 RE: Post making contest - Akumu - 05-29-2016 This is the first sentence? This is the second sentence. This now is the third sentence! RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 03:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » This post breaks rules 1 and 4. (05-29-2016, 03:25 AM)Akumu Wrote: »This is the first sentence? This is the second sentence. This now is the third sentence! This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 03:25 AM)Wheat Wrote: »This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. RE: Post making contest - Crowstone - 05-29-2016 it seems like just yesterday that ixcaliber was only a day younger RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 There's a possibility that I might have confused everyone with early rule 1 judgements. Really they were edge cases that forced me to make some adjustments on the fly and now this is a semi serious search to find an answer I wanna offer a hint. So the thing is those posts were in a situation where they couldn't have passed rule one due to circumstances so they got an auto pass. It's no longer the case, every post has the potential to do so now. Just try to avoid drawing false positives from them. This passes one and four by the way. RE: post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 03:37 AM)Crowstone Wrote: »it seems like just yesterday that ixcaliber was only a day younger Extremely flattering, but it still breaks 1, 3, 4 and 5. (05-29-2016, 03:37 AM)Wheat Wrote: »This post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. Wheat is doing a real good job. Don't let the fact that this breaks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 put you off Wheat! (05-29-2016, 03:37 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »There's a possibility that I might have confused everyone with early rule 1 judgements. Really they were edge cases that forced me to make some adjustments on the fly and now this is a semi serious search to find an answer I wanna offer a hint. So the thing is those posts were in a situation where they couldn't have passed rule one due to circumstances so they got an auto pass. It's no longer the case, every post has the potential to do so now. Just try to avoid drawing false positives from them. Confirming this breaks 2, 3 and 5. (ps this post is rule 4 compliant) RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 03:45 AM)Wheat Wrote: »A clause then another clause This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3 and 5. Way to go Wheat! (05-29-2016, 03:47 AM)Wheat Wrote: »I can do it! I'll do it! It's going to be done by me! We will do it! Yeah!!! Thus post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5, in addition to making me question whether I overuse exclamation marks. EDIT: I said the above post broke rule 2 and I was wrong it super obviously doesn't. Whoops! (05-29-2016, 03:47 AM)Wheat Wrote: »Thanks ixcaliber! You're great! No, wheat, you're great! Cue corny laugh track, fade to black etc. Meanwhile the post breaks rules 1, 3, 4 and 5. RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 05-29-2016 (05-29-2016, 03:55 AM)Wheat Wrote: »You can't overuse exclamation marks, you can only underuse them!!! More ! means more excitement!!!! I am in 100% agreement!! Despite the enthusiasm this post broke rules 1, 3, 4 and 5!!! |