![]() |
Post making contest 6.0 - Printable Version +- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org) +-- Forum: Cool Shit You Can Do (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Thread: Post making contest 6.0 (/showthread.php?tid=1482) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
|
RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 10-20-2017 (10-20-2017, 06:47 PM)Akumu Wrote: »~rat~, `ox`, !tiger!, @rabbit@, #dragon#, $snake$, %horse%, ^sheep^, &monkey&, *rooster*, (dog), _pig_ Passes rules 1, 2, 3 and 5. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 10-20-2017 Rule 4 is a wily one RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Dragon Fogel - 10-20-2017 I can't believe Dr. Wily was behind the Post Making Contest the whole time. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Dragon Fogel - 10-23-2017 What do you use when you need to demonstrate two separate relationships over a period of time? Paragraphs! RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 10-26-2017 (10-20-2017, 07:04 PM)Akumu Wrote: »Rule 4 is a wily one Rule 4 is something. No rules. (10-20-2017, 07:06 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I can't believe Dr. Wily was behind the Post Making Contest the whole time. My god what a shocking turn of events. No rules. (10-23-2017, 04:48 AM)Wheat Wrote: »(10-20-2017, 05:58 PM)Akumu Wrote: »rat, ox, tiger, rabbit, dragon, snake, horse, sheep, monkey, rooster, dog, pig Rules 1, 3 and 5 (10-23-2017, 05:44 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »What do you use when you need to demonstrate two separate relationships over a period of time? Might have chuckled. Passes rule 4. (10-23-2017, 06:50 AM)Wheat Wrote: »Paragraphs! Passes no rules (10-26-2017, 08:41 AM)Wheat Wrote: »(10-19-2017, 07:18 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Passes rule 1. Passes rules 2 and 4. What I meant was more along the lines of 'if you understand/can repeatably pass rules 2 and 5 and there's a post that has 1, 2, 3 and 5 then I'd just give you the thing. That one post is very close but it wouldn't pass rule 2 at the moment if I was to try reevaluating it. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Dragon Fogel - 10-31-2017 I completely forget where we were with any plans we may have been attempting. So instead i'M GOING TO MAKE ANOTHER HAIKU and also accidentally hit caps lock, whoops. This is a haiku, It is another haiku, Also a haiku RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 11-22-2017 Nobody seems to know what rule 2 is RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 11-22-2017 Obviously I should give a hint RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 11-22-2017 (10-31-2017, 02:50 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I completely forget where we were with any plans we may have been attempting. Passes no rules (11-22-2017, 01:20 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Nobody seems to know what rule 2 is Passes rule 2 (11-22-2017, 01:21 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Obviously I should give a hint Passes rule 2 RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 11-22-2017 (10-26-2017, 08:41 AM)Wheat Wrote: »(10-19-2017, 07:18 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Passes rule 1. CORRECTION IT TURNS OUT WHEAT'S POST DID PASS RULE 1. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 11-22-2017 ~rat~, `ox`, !tiger!, @rabbit@, #dragon#, $snake$, %horse%, ^sheep^, &monkey&, *rooster*, (dog), _pig_ -left-, +right+, =center=, {top}, [bottom], |forward|, \backward\, :ana:, ;kata; "Ixcaliber", 'Wheat', <Myeth>, .Schazer., ?Dragon Fogel?, /Reyweld/, (Akumu(, )Robust Laser), {Kíeros{, }SinkingSailor}, [a52[, ]Arcanuse] 31 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() post post post post post post post post post post post and just in case: rainbow RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 11-22-2017 (11-22-2017, 01:32 PM)Akumu Wrote: »~rat~, `ox`, !tiger!, @rabbit@, #dragon#, $snake$, %horse%, ^sheep^, &monkey&, *rooster*, (dog), _pig_ Passes all the rules!!!!! RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 11-22-2017 Here were the rules 1. Post must include the number 1 if it is the first time this rule is passed or the number 1 higher than the last time this rule was passed. The current number was 31. 2. A sentence inside the post must begin with the letter A if it is the first time this rule is passed or the next letter alphabetically from the last time this rule was passed. Sentences are demarked by full stops or line breaks. The current letter was P. 3. Post must include the colour red if it is the first time this rule is passed or the next colour in the sequence red-orange-yellow-green-blue-purple from the last time this rule was passed. The current colour was orange. (see previous discussion as to why indigo isn't a real colour imo) 4. Post must include in order all the letters of the first arcana Fool or the next arcana in sequence from the last time this rule was passed. The current arcana was Magician. 5. Post must include the username of the last person to pass rule 5. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 11-22-2017 Hooray! Now, in honor of the upcoming holiday, I will judge your posts against a new ruleset of my own devising. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Ixcaliber - 11-22-2017 Thank you Akumu for allowing me to clean my whiteboard worm RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 11-22-2017 (11-22-2017, 03:16 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Thank you Akumu for allowing me to clean my whiteboard You're welcome! This post passes rule 2, and it came amazingly close to passing rule 5, which is probably the hardest rule. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Robust Laser - 11-22-2017 i should probably change my bike tube before i have to leave for work RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 11-22-2017 (11-22-2017, 04:52 PM)Robust Laser Wrote: »i should probably change my bike tube before i have to leave for work This post passes rules 2 and 3. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Kíeros - 11-22-2017 0ω0 RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 11-22-2017 (11-22-2017, 05:33 PM)Kíeros Wrote: »0ω0 What's this? This post passes no rules rule 4! RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Kíeros - 11-22-2017 A random variable is said to have a zeta (sometimes called the Zipf) distribution if its probability mass function is given by P(X=k)=C/kα+1 k=1,2,... for some value of α>0. Since the sum of the foregoing probabilities must equal 1, it follows thatC=[∑(1/k)α+1]-1 The zeta distribution owes its name to the fact that the functionζ(s)=1+(1/2)s+(1/3)s+...+(1/k)s+... is known in mathematical disciplines as the Riemann zeta function (after the German mathematician G.F.B. Riemann).The zeta distribution was used by the Italian economist V. Pareto to describe the distribution of the family incomes in a given country. However, it was G.K. Zipf who applied zeta distribution to a wide variety of problems in different areas and, in doing so, popularised its use.[/quote]Good math! I'm so impressed that this passes all the rules, at least if you give me more math.[quote="Kíeros"]A very important property of expectations is that the expected value of a sum of random variables is equal to the sum of their expectations. In this section, we will prove this result under the assumption that the set of possible values of the probability experiment--that is, the sample space S--is either finite or countably infinite. Although the result is true without this assumption (and a proof is outlined in the theoretical exercises), not only will the assumption simplify the argument, but it will also result in an enlightening proof that will add to our intuition about expectations. So, for the remainder of this section, suppose that the sample space S is either a finite or a countably infinite set. For a random variable X, let X(s) denote the value of X when s∈S is the outcome of the experiment. Now, if X and Y are both random variables, then so is their sum. That is, Z=X+Y is also a random variable. Moreover, Z(s)=X(s)+Y(s). RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 11-22-2017 (11-22-2017, 06:18 PM)Kíeros Wrote: »A random variable is said to have a zeta (sometimes called the Zipf) distribution if its probability mass function is given byGood math! I'm so impressed that this passes all the rules, at least if you give me more math. Kíeros Wrote:[/noparse]A very important property of expectations is that the expected value of a sum of random variables is equal to the sum of their expectations. In this section, we will prove this result under the assumption that the set of possible values of the probability experiment--that is, the sample space S--is either finite or countably infinite. Although the result is true without this assumption (and a proof is outlined in the theoretical exercises), not only will the assumption simplify the argument, but it will also result in an enlightening proof that will add to our intuition about expectations. So, for the remainder of this section, suppose that the sample space S is either a finite or a countably infinite set. This post passes rules 1, 2, and 3. Don't you think I am onto your tricks by now, Kíeros? Edit: On further review, post #1727 also passed rule 3. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Kíeros - 11-22-2017 (11-22-2017, 06:34 PM)Akumu Wrote: »This post passes rules 1, 2, and 3. Don't you think I am onto your tricks by now, Kíeros?No? RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Akumu - 11-22-2017 (11-22-2017, 06:43 PM)Kíeros Wrote: »(11-22-2017, 06:34 PM)Akumu Wrote: »This post passes rules 1, 2, and 3. Don't you think I am onto your tricks by now, Kíeros?No? This unsuccessful post passes rules 2 and 3. RE: Post making contest 6.0 - Kíeros - 11-22-2017 Are you sure you don't wanna click these links? |