Post making contest 1.0 - Printable Version

Post making contest 1.0 - Printable Version

+- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Forum: Adventures and Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30)
+---- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Thread: Post making contest 1.0 (/showthread.php?tid=1809)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 12:56 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #5.

This post breaks rules, though I don't know exactly which.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 04-24-2016

I guess we'll just never know how these mysterious rules work.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:10 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »I guess we'll just never know how these mysterious rules work.

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #6.

(04-24-2016, 12:35 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #4.

Similar to test #3, which involved me saying some words, I am saying some here too. Unlike test #2, it does not contain a quote.

End of message.

This post breaks rules... well, actually come to think of it...

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:15 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #6.

(04-24-2016, 12:35 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #4.

Similar to test #3, which involved me saying some words, I am saying some here too. Unlike test #2, it does not contain a quote.

End of message.

This post breaks rules... well, actually come to think of it...

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #7. This post breaks rule 3.

(04-24-2016, 12:36 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
Lankie Wrote:

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:19 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #7. This post breaks rule 3.

(04-24-2016, 12:36 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
Lankie Wrote:

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #8.

...except it's really an aside at how rule 4 seems inviolable, and I seem incapable of violating rule 5 for some reason. I'll return to serious testing in a bit...

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:24 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #8.

...except it's really an aside at how rule 4 seems inviolable, and I seem incapable of violating rule 5 for some reason. I'll return to serious testing in a bit...

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

rullebreak extravaganza - Ixcaliber - 04-24-2016

Okay we've not seen rule 4 yet. Here's a concerted attempt to break it:

formatting! you know the drill by this point
now the other kind of formatting
~~a third type?~~

Sanzh Wrote:

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

boy am i gonna feel silly if there was a rule _four breaker already in ^our midst!

RE: Post making contest - Granolaman - 04-24-2016

fggytfhikjnhyuguybuih
blorp

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #9. It consists of an alteration to test #7 in an attempt to fix a potential source of rule violation.

Lankie Wrote:

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:26 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Okay we've not seen rule 4 yet. Here's a concerted attempt to break it:

formatting! you know the drill by this point

now the other kind of formatting

~~a third type?~~

Sanzh Wrote:

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

Spoiler

boy am i gonna feel silly if there was a rule _four breaker already in ^our midst!

This post breaks rules 2, 3, and 4. Congratulations on being the first to break rule 4.

(04-24-2016, 01:29 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »fggytfhikjnhyuguybuih
blorp

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 5.

(04-24-2016, 01:29 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #9. It consists of an alteration to test #7 in an attempt to fix a potential source of rule violation.

Lankie Wrote:

End of message.

This post breaks rules 2 and 3.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

For clarity in analyzing Ix's post, I'm going to note that I'm not evaluating anything in tags, URLs, or in the contents of pictures or videos.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:35 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »For clarity in analyzing Ix's post, I'm going to note that I'm not evaluating anything in tags, URLs, or in the contents of pictures or videos.

This post violates rules 2 and 3.

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #10.

(04-24-2016, 12:05 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #1.

End of message.

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

To further clarify: I am evaluating emoticons as they're written, so Fact Seagull

would be treated as:

Code:
:factseagull:

This includes the colons.

Also by "in tags", I mean "actually inside the brackets". For example, if someone says "food", I evaluate "food" but ignore the brackets and all things inside them.

I hope this clears things up.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:38 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #10.

(04-24-2016, 12:05 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #1.

End of message.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 1, 2, and 3.

(04-24-2016, 01:42 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »To further clarify: I am evaluating emoticons as they're written, so would be treated as:

Code:
:factseagull:

This includes the colons.

Also by "in tags", I mean "actually inside the brackets". For example, if someone says "food", I evaluate "food" but ignore the brackets and all things inside them.

I hope this clears things up.

This post breaks rules 1, 2, 3, and 4.

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #11.

Rule 2 baffles me.

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:48 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #11.

Rule 2 baffles me.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 1 and 2.

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #12.

And now I don't know rule 1 any more. But eh, I know how not to break it. That counts for something.

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 01:54 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #12.

And now I don't know rule 1 any more. But eh, I know how not to break it. That counts for something.

End of message.

This post breaks rules 1 and 2.

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-24-2016

This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-24-2016

(04-24-2016, 02:08 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #13.

At least I'm pretty confident on how to break rule 3... I mean, that leaves 1 and 2, but still...

Oh, and I think you're still invisible from when you were testing that for my set, Fogel.

End of message.

This post breaks rule 2.

RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 04-24-2016

While Sruix is trying to play bombs I'm gonna swoop in and solve the post rules.