Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Still a thing and unsure about playerlist) - Printable Version +- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org) +-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Forum: Adventures and Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30) +---- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Thread: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Still a thing and unsure about playerlist) (/showthread.php?tid=366) Pages:
1
2
|
Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Still a thing and unsure about playerlist) - MaxieSatan - 12-26-2012 So I've been kicking around this idea for a tabletop RPG campaign for a while, but not actually done that much about it. This changes now, as I am planning to start it in roughly a month (give or take, depending on people's schedules). Basically, there are three days a week that I can reasonably run this thang, those being Mondays and Wednesdays (Past 8:00 PM Eastern Standard Time) and Fridays (Past 6:00 PM, I believe) (other days are reserved for homeworkin', socializin', girlfriendin', etc.) but it doesn't really matter to me which of those days we pick so I'd appreciate input from prospective players as to which works best. In terms of number of PCs, there's probably room for about five players, maybe six tops. The system is Lightweight RPG, and the materials are linked here, and we'll be using something called Roll20.net to do the actual game stuff. General conceit of the campaign: Any questions, feel free to ask away. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - SleepingOrange - 12-26-2012 I can do Fridays best. I can also do alternate Wednesdays, but if this is going to be a weekly thing and I'm going to be involved in it, Fridays would be optimal. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - SeaWyrm - 12-26-2012 I am not a prospective player but I am pretty interested in the general practice of roleplaying and RPG game design. So I'm wondering about this system? Where'd you get it, and why'd you choose it? I see it's pretty combat/tactics heavy, is that where you're planning on going with this game? Do you have a good sense of how you'll reward boons? If it were me, I'd be worried about boons. There's no good reward cycle if the GM hands out rewards arbitrarily. It needs to be something the player can deliberately work for, or it's worthless - and particularly when that's the only element of character growth! That means the mechanics rob the players of any mechanically-relevant goals to work towards or control over their own characters. Not just a problem for the "power gamer" approach, but also for players who want their abilities to reflect their character as a character. I dunno, what do you think about that? RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - MaxieSatan - 12-26-2012 (12-26-2012, 05:01 AM)SeaWyrm Wrote: »I am not a prospective player but I am pretty interested in the general practice of roleplaying and RPG game design. So I'm wondering about this system? Where'd you get it, and why'd you choose it? I see it's pretty combat/tactics heavy, is that where you're planning on going with this game? Do you have a good sense of how you'll reward boons? Well, a big part of choosing the system is that I feel like it has a fair amount of meat to it without being excessively complex. I've GM'd super-simple systems in the past, which are easy to run but get boring fast; and other systems I've looked at have often seemed complex enough to make them unfeasible to run. I playtested this one at PAX East, actually, and it struck me as a good balance of depth and ease of access. As for boons, that's a good question and I'm glad you asked it! I'll probably hand out a few one-or-two use items during lulls, and talk to my players about what they think would be appropriate for that. More major boons I think would be best for when an arc is resolved, which (depending on the depth) might be anywhere from 3 to 6 sessions (of course, that's an estimate). Individual character arcs would also be a factor, of course, and I'll keep thinking that over. I think, given that this is a new system, some of it's going to be trial and error, and I do invite any players to chip in on how they think things could be made to flow better. As for combat-heaviness, the one-off session I did previously did end up being fairly combat-heavy, so I think something I'll need to be careful about is not having too many large encounters, as well as making sure to load a fair amount of non-combat stuff in (perhaps even what might on paper seem disproportionate, but in practice evens out). Like I said, some of this is just by nature going to be "we'll see how it goes and adjust it if need be", which I think will be good in some ways and bad in others. But I'll certainly work towards making it a good experience, both in terms of what I observe and what any players mention. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - AgentBlue - 12-26-2012 Friday evening is Saturday morning are you asking me to wake up early RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - SeaWyrm - 12-26-2012 Is combat-heaviness something you want, though? I just notice that about 50% of these rules revolve around combat. And will the players be able to work for particular boons? I really am concerned about these boons. Frankly, they seem pretty broken to me. It seems to boil down to "Character advancement takes the form of the GM handing out +1s to skills according to his whim." In my opinion, character growth should be the domain of the players, not the GM. They should have direct control over what their characters get better at. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - Jacquerel - 12-27-2012 I'm not sure if signups are open or not (actually I am because you just said they are in IRC but I am pretending I'm not because as I am writing this it is not yet in the topic) but if you are looking for people I would be interested. In terms of me: Friday is a very good day Monday is an alrightish day but not ideal Wednesday is no, very bad, definitely not RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - Not The Author - 12-27-2012 Yeh, I'll bite. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) - MaxieSatan - 12-27-2012 (12-26-2012, 10:26 PM)SeaWyrm Wrote: »And will the players be able to work for particular boons? I really am concerned about these boons. Frankly, they seem pretty broken to me. It seems to boil down to "Character advancement takes the form of the GM handing out +1s to skills according to his whim."I would definitely say that pretty much all permanent boons would either be entirely or partially up to the player(s) receiving them. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Yes hello signups are open still) - chimericgenderbeast - 12-27-2012 I might be interested in this but uh, my schedule's absolutely abysmal. Saturday's literally the only free day, seeing as I'm in lab on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Yes hello signups are open still) - AgentBlue - 12-27-2012 Saturday night is Sunday morning Are you telling me to yeah no can't do sunday. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Yes hello signups are open still) - Nopad - 12-27-2012 pretty sure i don't have time to do this but wanna roll up a character anyway hold on RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - MaxieSatan - 12-31-2012 Alright so, somewhat unsurprisingly it sounds like this is going to be run on Friday evenings; specifically, I'm thinking something like seven PM, EST/EDT (eleven or midnight GMT, depending on whether daylight savings is happening). If people need it to be later than that we'll see to working that out, but I can't go much earlier based on my class schedule. Any other problems/questions you can hit me up via PM either here or on IRC; character sheets soonish would be appreciated. As I understand it, the current lineup is - Nottles - Agen maybe - XX - Godbot - Slorange - Jacquerel but feel free to correct me on that and I'll see what needs doing. Character Sheet template: RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - AgentBlue - 12-31-2012 CHARACTER SHEET TEMPLATES PLZ RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - Hellfish - 01-03-2013 Hey so planning-wise, godbot and I are going in kind of a tanky direction, has anyone else been meandering in the direction of a role? RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - SeaWyrm - 01-03-2013 You guys should all be bards. You can be a travelling theater troupe! RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - AgentBlue - 01-03-2013 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yvFUi2BexOub7DP8dYgVaqf5jA4G9jHzeVIvu3GamfM/edit I hath designed an ex-cop who does parkour! Designed to be a striker on any team, should the need arise. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - Jacquerel - 01-03-2013 I have very little preference about what I am doing, though as I suspect as any kind of healing role would seem to generally be the least popular I can start thinking in that direction. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - Nopad - 01-04-2013 oh hey turns out i actually do have time for this; i'm going to roll up a basketbard RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - fakeimpostor - 01-04-2013 Freakin hell i wanna do this so badly RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - Nopad - 01-04-2013 basketbard RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - Hellfish - 01-04-2013 Tentative character sheet in development: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18P9z7vpAovm8S3rdlLOoFx4QNPnZb_pbOkhRHrHJY9c/edit RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - Jacquerel - 01-04-2013 I think someone's going to have to start a second game due to abundance of interest This is like Pokemon Tabletop all over again :V RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - SeaWyrm - 01-05-2013 Nopad clearly has the best possible character and the rest of you should just give up now. Wait, no, now I'm reading the other ones. RE: Glorified Mercenaries (LWRPG) (Pretty sure signups are closed??) - Jacquerel - 01-10-2013 I've realised based on recent developments that I probably don't really have time for this, fortunately you've got a lot of other hopefuls that could be a replacement. |