+- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Forum: BAWK BAWK (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=34)
+---- Forum: Hawkspace (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=35)
+---- Thread: Complexity (/showthread.php?tid=1917)
Complexity - Reyweld - 10-01-2016
This will be a game of many rules. To win a round, reach 10 correctly! A post not following the rules will not be counted and will be effectively not there. If you win a round, you get to create a new rule (that is unknown to the public). You may also choose to just be in the know on a new rule I make. New rules may be adjusted without your knowledge, but probably won't if your rule is easy to implement.
DEFAULT RULES
1. You must increase by 1 each time, unless stated by another rule.
2. You cannot post more than once in a row.
3. The post for number 5 must say "Have a nice day."
4. When 10 is correctly reached, all posts are invalid until Reyweld announces the winner and starts the next round.
5. The same player cannot win twice in a row.
Note that these are the rules of the game as opposed to the rules of the thread, feel free to double post to trick people or other such tactics.
EDIT: also pls don't edit your posts, pls !!!
---
GAME START: 1
RE: Complexity - OTTO - 10-01-2016
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-01-2016
4
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-01-2016
5
Have a nice day.
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-01-2016
2
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-01-2016
3
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-01-2016
5, have a nice day
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-01-2016
3, have a nice day.
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-01-2016
6
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-01-2016
6
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-01-2016
6
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-01-2016
6
RE: Complexity - Kíeros - 10-01-2016
π
RE: Complexity - OTTO - 10-01-2016
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-01-2016
7
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-01-2016
8
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-02-2016
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-02-2016
6
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-02-2016
9
RE: Complexity - qwerx3 - 10-02-2016
Have a nice day.
RE: Complexity - Robust Laser - 10-02-2016
10
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-02-2016
10
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-02-2016
i started at 4, i'm operating under the idea that we are all counting for ourselves and not as a group. it's not stated which way it is, and i'm absolutely sure that's intentional to confuse us with wrong assumptions. that's why i'm taking the more counter-intuitive tactic. but if that's true then i think robbie laser outdid me just by starting at 10, unless reyweld has a secret rule against that
RE: Complexity - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 10-02-2016
also, who would willingly post the nine knowing that they'd just get scooped on the ten?
RE: Complexity - SeaWyrm - 10-02-2016
Apparently you would.