(08-21-2018, 05:22 AM)Sai Wrote: »I think LegendaryQ and Granola aren't partnered

(08-22-2018, 10:48 PM)Pharmacy Wrote: »@Numbers. Maybe Sai is hinting at something happening if LegendaryQ and Granola met each other. There is some hint nuggets ™ in some people's flavor stuff in the role pms.

(08-22-2018, 01:13 PM)Reyweld Wrote: »Something I do find interesting is LegendaryQ's #153, which basically says to me that LegendaryQ has been ignoring the conversation because it’s just “RVS time silliness”. Not only does it offer no substantial stance on me, but tries to brush aside everything being currently discussed. Instead of *trying* to offer anything new, they put the onus back onto me.

(08-22-2018, 09:57 AM)Schazer Wrote: »Phlegm!!!!!

(08-23-2018, 01:27 AM)Solaris Wrote: »its good to hear that you're taking your absolutely definitely inevitable death in stride

(08-22-2018, 12:31 AM)BlazerC Wrote: »

(08-21-2018, 05:56 AM)Acionyx Wrote: »

(08-21-2018, 05:22 AM)Sai Wrote: »I think LegendaryQ and Granola aren't partnered

What makes you think that so early?

But I also kind of want to bring attention to this! Because yeah, that's a weird thing to say as early as page 3!

So lets clarify, Vote: Sai, what do you mean by this? Does 'not partnered' mean non-aligned or something? What's the logic here?

(08-22-2018, 01:50 AM)BlazerC Wrote: »Just don't like it whenever someone goes "here's my town reads" without adding any kind of scum reads I guess. Too 'safe' and easy to make it look like you're contributing. Because no-one's going to challenge you on calling them a townie.

Currently feeling slightly iffy about you Coldblooded and Granola. Take that for what you will.

(08-22-2018, 03:11 AM)Schazer Wrote: »Hey scum show up at my door tonight and murder all five of my asses so the gang here has something substantial to talk about

(08-22-2018, 04:32 AM)Airey Wrote: »

(08-22-2018, 04:27 AM)SleepingOrange Wrote: »No thanks.

no thanks because you think everyone will be like " yeah na" and lynch you instead or because you are scared to hit town and then get lynched for a bad call/suspected of scum?

right now i doubt we will hit hard lynch for d1 and the soft lynch will be the factor. it would be bad if we go without a lynch d1.

(08-22-2018, 10:43 AM)BlazerC Wrote: »so

I totally forgot that at some point I had changed my vote to Sai, thought I still was on Justice Watch. Hwuugh I'm stupid. That's why you guys were so confused by that unvote.

Let me go back to Vote: Sai because I personally still want an answer on that weird comment of theirs and their silence is bugging me a bit now.

(08-22-2018, 11:34 PM)Numbers Wrote: »I'll Vote Sai as well, cause I agree that making it more threatening will make them speak.

(08-22-2018, 11:59 PM)Reyweld Wrote: »Sai has literally posted once in the proclaimed "RVS" period of the game. While I also would be interested in what Sai has to say, I expect the answer will be "It was a joke".

(08-23-2018, 01:06 AM)TehPilot Wrote: »What up

Vote: LegendaryQ I'm of the opinion that recommending a lurker lynch late into a slow D1 is looking for a low information death to kick the game off. While we've heard plenty from the school of thought that D1 is a drag, I'm more than happy to go with a more aggressive D1 lynch if it means there are more sophisticated thoughts and more interaction surrounding it, which means we can get more information out of it.

As far as I am concerned, a D1 lurker is little/no information worthwhile gained. Not thrilled with the vote direction presented by lQ so that's where I'm parking my vote for now (today?).

Numbers' early play isn't thrilling me either but I feel it's general nervous first time play over any particular town/scum inclined first time play. I'm willing to re-evaluate it tomorrow when more information comes to light and we see more play from them. In the same vein: interested to see how Airey, Schazer, and Robust Laser do early tomorrow. Airey is shitposting, Schazer is very mechanical, RL's post #155 gave me the yike (singular).

No other major standouts in the negative opinion direction at the time of writing.

(08-23-2018, 02:02 AM)LegendaryQ Wrote: »Unvote while I read this wall that just showed up

(08-23-2018, 02:00 AM)Sai Wrote: »Hey now, I consider Lurker a pejorative. I get what you're saying, but in general it's probably a good idea to lynch lurkers earlier because otherwise you're stuck without much to read on them later.

(08-23-2018, 02:09 AM)LegendaryQ Wrote: »Questions now that I've read wall:

Sai:
- Out of curiosity, just poking the me/Granola thing in a general aspect, what sort of value do you find in early posts? A lot of what threw me off with that post was that it was with respect to early posts that would easily fall in the realm of RVS (I certainly consider them as such).

Quote:- Opinions on the whole Reyweld thing?

Quote:- Thoughts on Numbers in general? (newbie town or perhaps something else, or too early to tell, or....?)

Quote:aND YES, I don't like Schazer's magic bagging soft claim nonsense of "murder all five of my asses" too, alongside their muttering of "It's cool to not contribute on Day One because Day One is stupid" but that's all kinda just reeking to me of Third Party of sorts more than anything else.

Quote:But ugh at this point though we're probably not going to get a lynch through and let it be known I am not comfortable with wagoning on Sai that hard (even if they did just say "don't pick on me I always get almost lynched especially on day one" nonsense)

(08-23-2018, 02:29 AM)Sai Wrote: »I didn't say that. I think you may have misread my bit about always lynching. I was saying that town should almost always lynch, not that I personally tend to get lynched.

(08-23-2018, 02:00 AM)Sai Wrote: »I'm in the 'almost always lynch' camp, including/especially D1.