Post making contest 1.0 - Printable Version

Post making contest 1.0 - Printable Version

+- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Forum: Adventures and Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30)
+---- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Thread: Post making contest 1.0 (/showthread.php?tid=1809)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016

POINT OF NOTE: Due to the fact that I am not currently giving this my full attention, I missed the fact that post #166 violates rule 5. Since I would like to keep future mistakes to a minimum, this will probably be the last post for an hour or so. Probably.

(04-22-2016, 08:09 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
Quote:Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

This post violates rules 1 and 4.

(04-22-2016, 08:10 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
Lankie Wrote:Does this violate Rule 4?

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.

(04-22-2016, 08:11 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*&

Will this pass rule 4?

This post violates rules 1 and 4.

We just don't know. This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4. Rule 3 is satisfied, technically, but not ideally.

RE: Post making contest - OTTO - 04-22-2016

You must be registered to view this content.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

(04-22-2016, 03:42 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*&

These are the only posts to pass Rule 4.

(04-22-2016, 03:22 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
Here is some writing outside the quote.

This is identical to an earlier post aside from the additional writing. It violates Rule 4, and the same rules as the earlier posts.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

So will this make it through Rule 4?

:winky: - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

RE: :winky: - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.

(04-22-2016, 08:50 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

(04-22-2016, 03:42 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*&

These are the only posts to pass Rule 4.

(04-22-2016, 03:22 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:13 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »
Here is some writing outside the quote.

This is identical to an earlier post aside from the additional writing. It violates Rule 4, and the same rules as the earlier posts.

This post violates rules 1, 3, 4 and 5.

(04-22-2016, 08:51 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

So will this make it through Rule 4?

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4.

(04-22-2016, 08:53 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 3.

(04-22-2016, 08:57 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 3.

RE: Post making contest - Reyweld - 04-22-2016

Quote:.

RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 09:18 PM)Reyweld Wrote: »
Quote:.

This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and, if I'm being strict, 5.

(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

This post violates rules 1 and 2.

RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016

What about this? ;)

RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?*

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 09:46 PM)btp Wrote: »What about this? ;)

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 5.

(04-22-2016, 09:51 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?*

This post violates rules 1, 2 and 5.

RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

This post violates rules 1 and 4.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.

Post making contest - Granolaman - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016

(04-22-2016, 11:34 PM)Granolaman Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.

RE: Post making contest - Granolaman - 04-23-2016

#125

(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.

This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.

#144

(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?

#147

(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?

&

#154

(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »
Sruixan Wrote:

#157

(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!

#160

(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan

Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?

Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.

Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-23-2016

(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

This violated 1 and 2.

(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

This violated 1 and 4.

Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-23-2016

Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.

All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.

Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-23-2016

Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.

These are the posts, to be more specific:

https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123225#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123247#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123230#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123275#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123281#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123286#pid123286

RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-23-2016

(04-23-2016, 12:07 AM)Granolaman Wrote: »#125

(04-22-2016, 03:08 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:03 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »...ah, balls to it. I'm procrastinating something fierce right now anyway.

This is post #1. It violates the following rules: 1, 2, 3 and 4.

#144

(04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?

#147

(04-22-2016, 04:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert?

&

#154

(04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »
Sruixan Wrote:

#157

(04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time!

#160

(04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan

Only posts so far to pass Rule 1. Content doesn't appear to be the factor. Anyone see anything in the timestamps/post number?

Sruix isn't allowed to sleep til we solve this.

Also note Sruix lives in a different timezone than most of us.

This post violates rules 4 and 5.

I would also like you guys to solve this before I go to bed. Also, I'm writing this in purple now because I just previewed this post and dear lord it's pretty dense otherwise.

(04-23-2016, 12:17 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 11:16 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 09:34 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: »?

;)

This violated 1 and 2.

(04-22-2016, 10:03 PM)btp Wrote: »
(04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread.

Is that difficult to check?*

Rule 3 ;)

Any closer?

This violated 1 and 4.

Together, they violate 1, 4, and 5.

This post violates rules 1 and 4.

(04-23-2016, 12:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Here's something I just noticed about those Rule 1 posts.

All but one of them immediately followed a post (not counting Sruix's rule-checks_ that violated rules 1-4. This post is the only exception.

Maybe Rule 1 has something to do with the previous post?

This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5.

(04-23-2016, 12:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Okay. So I found several posts immediately following 1,2,3,4-breaking posts that still broke Rule 1. I guess that's a coincidence.

These are the posts, to be more specific:

https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123225#pid123225
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123247#pid123247
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123230#pid123230
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123275#pid123275
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123281#pid123281
https://eagle-time.org/showthread.php?tid=1482&pid=123286#pid123286

This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5.

RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-23-2016

Oh wait, Fact Seagull

gom Sruixan wasn't after a 1-4 violation, it was after a 1-3 and 5 violation.

It also doesn't seem to have anything to do with the poster of the previous message, as Bob has gotten successful Rule 1s when I had the last message and when he did. He has also failed Rule 1 in both cases.

I also considered "starts with the final letter of the previous post" but that didn't get me anywhere.