(06-20-2016, 04:58 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »

(06-20-2016, 04:35 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame, [b] [video=youtube]youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ[/video]

(06-20-2016, 05:08 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »one two three four five seventeen

(06-20-2016, 05:08 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,

1. give you up
   
2. let you down
   

(06-20-2016, 05:14 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »Never gonna give you balderdash

(06-20-2016, 05:14 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I'm thinking Rule 5 may be partially meta, since the same text has passed it and failed it at different times.

Not that I have any clue what the meta requirement might be.

Jabberwock.

(06-20-2016, 05:15 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »that is probably the case yes

(06-20-2016, 05:16 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Never gonna:

1. give you up
   
2. let you down
   

(06-20-2016, 05:19 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I just had a stupid idea.

(06-19-2016, 11:55 PM)Akumu Wrote: »You skipped post 6591, CrimsonMage

(06-19-2016, 11:56 PM)Kíeros Wrote: »Never gonna give you balderdash

(06-20-2016, 12:00 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,

(06-20-2016, 12:04 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 01:26 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Okay we've not seen rule 4 yet. Here's a concerted attempt to break it:

1. formatting! you know the drill by this point
   
2. now the other kind of formatting
   
3. a third type?
   

Sanzh Wrote:

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

Spoiler

boy am i gonna feel silly if there was a rule _four breaker already in ^our midst!

(06-20-2016, 05:20 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »

(06-19-2016, 11:55 PM)Akumu Wrote: »You skipped post 6591, CrimsonMage

(06-19-2016, 11:56 PM)Kíeros Wrote: »Never gonna give you balderdash

(06-20-2016, 12:00 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,

(06-20-2016, 12:04 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 01:26 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Okay we've not seen rule 4 yet. Here's a concerted attempt to break it:

1. formatting! you know the drill by this point
   
2. now the other kind of formatting
   
3. a third type?
   

Sanzh Wrote:

Show Content

Spoiler

Show Content

Spoiler

boy am i gonna feel silly if there was a rule _four breaker already in ^our midst!

(06-20-2016, 05:27 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »two-faced

(06-20-2016, 06:16 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I guess I should try this, just to be thorough.

(06-20-2016, 06:16 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I guess I should try this, just to be thorough.

(06-20-2016, 06:27 AM)Kaynato Wrote: »

(06-20-2016, 06:16 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I guess I should try this, just to be thorough.

Gallia in tres partes diviserat.

1. face
   
2. face
   

(06-20-2016, 06:40 AM)Kaynato Wrote: »Enter Kent, Gloucester, and Edmund. [Kent and Glouceste converse.
Edmund stands back.]
Kent. I thought the King had more affected the Duke of Albany
than
Cornwall.
Glou. It did always seem so to us; but now, in the division of
the
kingdom, it appears not which of the Dukes he values most,
for
equalities are so weigh'd that curiosity in neither can make
choice of either's moiety.
Kent. Is not this your son, my lord?
Glou. His breeding, sir, hath been at my charge. I have so
often
blush'd to acknowledge him that now I am braz'd to't.
Kent. I cannot conceive you.
Glou. Sir, this young fellow's mother could; whereupon she grew
round-womb'd, and had indeed, sir, a son for her cradle ere
she
had a husband for her bed. Do you smell a fault?
Kent. I cannot wish the fault undone, the issue of it being so
proper.
Glou. But I have, sir, a son by order of law, some year elder
than
this, who yet is no dearer in my account. Though this knave
came
something saucily into the world before he was sent for, yet
was
his mother fair, there was good sport at his making, and the
whoreson must be acknowledged.- Do you know this noble
gentleman,
Edmund?
Edm. [comes forward] No, my lord.
Glou. My Lord of Kent. Remember him hereafter as my honourable
friend.
Edm. My services to your lordship.
Kent. I must love you, and sue to know you better.
Edm. Sir, I shall study deserving.
Glou. He hath been out nine years, and away he shall again.
Sound a sennet.
The King is coming.

(06-20-2016, 06:40 AM)qwerx3 Wrote: »face

(06-20-2016, 10:56 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

1. face
   
2. face
   

(06-20-2016, 03:48 PM)qwerx3 Wrote: »Every single post in this entire thread could have potentially passed rule 5.