Post making contest 1.0 - Printable Version +- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org) +-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Forum: Adventures and Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30) +---- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=32) +---- Thread: Post making contest 1.0 (/showthread.php?tid=1809) |
Post making contest 1.0 - Sruixan - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 04:33 PM)btp Wrote: »(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Surixian Wrote: » This post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. (04-22-2016, 04:33 PM)Lankie Wrote: »Quote:Sruixan, why are you so cool & smart? Remember your secret rule six? This post violates rules 1, 2, 4 and 5. RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 g0m RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 06:48 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m This post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 Sruixan Wrote: RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Sruixan Wrote: » RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 06:58 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan Wrote: This post violates rules 2, 3, 4 and 5. (04-22-2016, 07:01 PM)btp Wrote: »(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Sruixan Wrote: » This post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. (I am ignoring the message that tells you that a post has been edited because I don't want another edge-case headache) RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time! RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time! RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 07:07 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time! This post violates rules 2, 3 and 5. (04-22-2016, 07:08 PM)btp Wrote: »Thanks! I can't believe I misspelled Sruixan the first time! This post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 5. RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 g0m Sruixan RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert? RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert? RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m Sruixan This post violates rules 2, 3, 4 and 5. (04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert? This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4. (04-22-2016, 07:27 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert? This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4. RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 Since identical posts are breaking Rule 5 at some points and not at others, Rule 5 must either relate to the post number, post id, or the time of posting. g0m RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 Actually I meant Rule 1 in that last post. g0m RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread. Is that difficult to check?* Rule 3 ;) RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 ?????? RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 For reference, the above post has six question marks while an earlier post I made has five. RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 03:42 PM)Lankie Wrote: »(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*& (04-22-2016, 03:49 PM)btp Wrote: »Sruixan, is one of your rules a self insert? I also note that Sruixan's first post this round says "This is post #1" and it violates rule 1. Perhaps it has to do with post number counting from when the round started. RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 Maybe. Gosh I hope it doesn't have anything to do with primes. With every guess potential correct posts get farther and farther away! RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Since identical posts are breaking Rule 5 at some points and not at others, Rule 5 must either relate to the post number, post id, or the time of posting. This post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Actually I meant Rule 1 in that last post. This post violates rules 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. (04-22-2016, 07:37 PM)btp Wrote: »Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread. This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5. (04-22-2016, 07:39 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »?????? This post violates rules 1, 2 and 4. I think it violates 3, but a second opinion believes it doesn't. (04-22-2016, 07:44 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » For reference, the above post has six question marks while an earlier post I made has five. This post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. (04-22-2016, 07:47 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »(04-22-2016, 03:42 PM)Lankie Wrote: »(04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*& This post violates rules 1, 4 and 5. (04-22-2016, 07:48 PM)btp Wrote: »Maybe. Gosh I hope it doesn't have anything to do with primes. With every guess potential correct posts get farther and farther away! This post violates rules 1, 2, 3 and 4. I had forgotten that I had numbered my original post. It was in no way relevant. RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 Quote:Okay so rule one is that it cannot be the same as a previous post in the thread. RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 04-22-2016 Lankie Wrote:Does this violate Rule 4? RE: Post making contest - btp - 04-22-2016 (04-22-2016, 03:12 PM)Lankie Wrote: » ;)*& Will this pass rule 4? RE: Post making contest - OTTO - 04-22-2016 You must be registered to view this content. |