RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Airey - 09-11-2018
(09-11-2018, 08:35 PM)Coldblooded Wrote: »Why is your goal to get the siren lynched then, if LQ's goal was specifically to nightkill them? It even says in his flip that if the siren was lynched, he would just daykill whoever hammered them.
I got his alignment not his powers, the only way for me to kill him is either a lynch or my bomb. No way for me to nightkill him. And if he was the hammer then he wouldn't of killed himself.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Airey - 09-11-2018
Also just a heads up for the next 4 hours i am running off generator power as we are testing them ( i am at work) so i wont be able to post more till the testing is over.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Numbers - 09-12-2018
(09-11-2018, 12:06 PM)Solaris Wrote: »also i guess at least one of slorange or schazer is not mafia, definitely feels like the sort of thing thats fine to just let sit aside for a while imo
beru do you have opinions on stuff that doesn't have to do with airey or nola? ty
numbers vanished after the start of today, numbers do you have anything to add about anything that happened today? i wanted to believe you're just naive town but im getting less and less convinced of that?
Sorry 'bout that. I have school right now and that's causing me to not be here most of the time. Anyways, on today's happenings:
Show Content
NTA's post
(09-11-2018, 02:58 AM)Not The Author Wrote: »Mostly this whole experience has reminded me why I started only joining gimmick mafias: I just don't know what to look for when it comes to scumhunting. That D2 read list was based more on vibes than actual analysis, because I never actually got around to the actual analysis I'd hoped to do. Like, "Not Third Party" is essentially "people who are invested in making lynches happen, but who I can't pin as either Mafia or Town specifically." And even then, "Mafia" and "Town" read more as "Mafia?" and "Town???" because they're based as much on tone and activity as anything else, which is not a way of assessing things that I can get behind! Even though it's the only way I can asses things most of the time!
Is this me defending myself? Nope! My play's been garbage and people are right to suspect me for it! Is any of this helpful? Maybe! It'll probably give some of you a better read on my alignment somehow, someway that I'll never be able to understand! Is this too self-aware? I still don't know what the hell that means!!
This post mostly seems like a long-winded thing about how they aren't good at this, they don't know how to look close, etc etc, and frankly, it looks a tad bit like a bunch of excuses. I'll get to NTA in more depth later, but right now I want to focus on today.
Robust Laser's posts seem fine, my thoughts on them are pretty town-ish.
Show Content
x1372's Post (09-11-2018, 03:35 PM)x1372 Wrote: »Allrighty, there's gonna be a lot of bits and bobs in this post, including some explanations behind a few of my questions. There's a lot of mechanical guessing and such, much of which could be wrong, but here goes.
I am no longer totally convinced that this game setup contains a serial killer. If I had to guess, I'd say there's a town-sided vigilante or something. The two (presumably non-mafia) targets based on death and claim from my view mesh perfectly with the actions of a scum-hunting vigilante. Our only real evidence that those kills were non-townsided was LegendaryQ's flip, and it's not inconceivable that the wailren's target is allied with the town or the scum faction. Metagaming a bit here, but it'd sounds kinda unfair for a SK to have additional pressure of someone hunting them, but that's not nearly as much of a problem balance-wise for a vigilante. I was slightly fishing to see if granolaman might comment on the possibility, but no matter. Of course, this goes completely against things that Airey was saying in their response to my questions, but I'm particularly trusting of that.
Speaking of granolaman, who ARE your biggest scum reads then, if Robot Laser isn't one of them? Because RL was the highest scum read you had on... well, anyone who voted to lynch EITHER non-scum lynch victim we've had in the game so far. It seems curious that you don't have much of a scum-read on any of them.
Next, I'd like a bit of context. How experienced of a player is coldblooded? And is she the crafty type who's likely to pull off something like the following?
I certainly don't currently believe this is the case, but I've got this nagging suspicion that they could be involved in a pretty sneaky scum gambit today. I can't help but note that coldblooded jumped out early to claim that Jacquerel got shot before Jacquerel had a chance to comment on it himself. This makes Jacquerel the closest thing we have to confirmed town, and makes coldblooded look good for doing so. And that'd be a heck of a dangerous gambit for two scum-buds to make (since it would presumably have also included not taking a shot n2), but not NEARLY as much of one for coldblooded to do so as scum with Jacquerel as a townie. Because if Jacquerel survived an attack by scum, scum knows it. I've been on scum teams that made crazier gambits than that, though never quite as quick on the draw about it as coldblooded was. If, indeed, it was a scum gambit, which I currently doubt, but can't completely shake the possibility. The fact that Jacquerel and coldblooded seem to be sharing winks about fluff makes this whole thing even less likely. In any event, it's clear that Airey wasn't thinking about or willing to speak to that theory, because they didn't bite on my “either or both scum” question.
Schazer's vote post targeting numbers bugs me a wee bit. Arguing that it would have been better to not give an explanation for a vote rather than a weak one seems... eh? I mean heck, I sorta did that when I initially voted tehpilot but I was admittedly at least partially trying to gauge their reaction and followed it up (far more dickishly than I should have) later.
It feels weird, I think I'm the only person whose opinion of Blazer/Lordy actually went DOWN when they claimed. Reading day 2 start I was thinking of that slot as my strongest town read, right up until the claim that I double-plus did not like. It's weird that other people seem to be leaning slight town because of that claim, while I went from leaning strong town to only slight town because of it.
So Airey is claiming 3rd party in addition to all of the rest. Hmf. Really not liking this. Part of me wants to lynch that just on principle, but at the very least I don't want to push toward ending the day early.
Regarding claims of what happened last night. None of the targets have claimed an extra hit point or bulletproof (and it'd be completely nonsensical for Airey given their claims). Presumably something or someone prevented all kills from going through last night (coldblooded and jacquerel fluff comments nonwithstanding). That seems like a crazy strong power, even for a one-shot. A weird thought, and part of why I'm a bit hesitant to join the Airey vote train, is that this “blood” event or whatever could be just delaying the deaths. If that's the case, and he is telling the truth about having been targeted, then the Airey lynch would be a waste as they would likely be dead tomorrow anyway. If airey's telling the truth about being a bomb and isn't lynched, we could have 5 people dead at daystart tomorrow.
Just in case that theory's true... hey Jacquerel? Would you mind giving out some additional reads, and asking some questions of the rest of the group? Right now you're the closest thing to confirmed town that we are likely to get in this game, and if there's even a chance you're living on borrowed time I'd like to make the most of it.
I agree with x1372's first statement here; I am unsure if there's actually a SK here. Although, that doesn't mean if there's actually one or not. Nobody really knows right now. On everything else I'm kinda 'eh'. Unsure about them.
Show Content
Jacq's Posts (09-11-2018, 05:26 PM)Jacquerel Wrote: »So like I just want to repeat to make it clear, according to my quicktopic the reason I didn't die is because Coldblooded's night action prevented it from happening.
The kill on me definitely would have gone through without the interference of Coldblooded.
My death was not delayed, I'm not going to die when the day ends or tomorrow morning (unless someone shoots me again tonight).
Whoever tried to kill me did actually kill someone, it just wasn't me (or any other player). Coldblooded's son valiantly took the bullet in my place and then died in my arms, may he not be forgotten.
What Coldblooded described happening matches exactly what my quicktopic says, and thus I am heavily sceptical of any speculation that some other effect prevented all kills last night, because in that case I don't imagine the flavour or non-flavour mechanical explanation of events which I got would be what it was.
Which in turn makes me heavily sceptical of Airey who claims that two additional people should have died last night and did not, which is a large number of people to not die, and also that their flavour and mechanical explanation are incompatible with how the game was at daystart, which is just weird.
And then claimed not to be aligned with town for, some reason.
I am willing to entertain the idea that the "Siren" is something which isn't a serial killer, and the extra kills that have been floating around have been from someone else, but I think it's pretty unlikely that Airey would lie about being shot. That would only be a safe claim if Airey had been the person doing the shooting and couldn't or didn't want to do it last night, otherwise they're begging for the actual second person who got shot to counterclaim them.
Also in case it interests anyone, I double triple checked my quicktopic and I did find one useful piece of information about this blood (not really, but it's funny and I wanted to relay it to everyone else): It doesn't belong to any active Monomin employees, so you don't need to worry about that.
This is a place of science, is it really that unusual for the corridors to be running with blood?
(09-11-2018, 06:01 PM)Jacquerel Wrote: »My vibes from yesterday haven't changed much apart from I can feel a little better about some people who are town (including myself)
My post-work post is going to have to turn into another post later because it turns out there's still a bunch of people who I have like, not strong enough feelings to write about right now, and now that scum have rudely thrust my into the limelight I guess that's my job now
Very Town: Me, Coldblooded, Blazer/Lordlyhour
Kind of town: Solaris, Slorange, x/Acio,
Don't know: RobustLaser, Granola
Don't like: Numbers? NTA, TehPilot
Would kill: Airey, Schazer
I already said yesterday that Airey was my second lynch after aC and then someone tried to shoot me.
They've been wildly going in on Solaris all game and even after their explanation I don't get it. Why does Airey believe so strongly that Solaris is their target?
Solaris looks good (and in the game) by prolonged, unfeigned emnity with Airey (although to be fair, mostly one-sided). Whatever they have going on is not something two coaligned people would do, although if Airey was a third party that means a lot less.
I still don't really know where Airey's idea that Solaris is the theoretical serial killer came from.
Granola, Solaris, and TehPilot share my 100% mislynch record, but also like, scum have enough information to not do that? It would be a bad idea to vote for someone you know isn't scum twice in a row, then shoot me and reyweld (unless I wasn't shot by the mafia), which makes me feel better about the people who voted for Q day one.
At this point I don't think more than like one person and maybe it could be 0 people from the day one wagon are scum.
Schazer's in that weird place where she's acting like she wants to die and otherwise barely interacting with the game at all, to the extent where it feels like trying to lynch her would be a waste of a day, but that's exactly the position scum want to be in?
She's also vagueing like hell about having some ability which means she wants to die at night time but that's like, the opposite behaviour to someone who wants to get shot at night. If you want someone to shoot you then you need to draw attention to yourself, which they are not doing, and also, not literally tell them that you want them to shoot you.
Saying "I have a role where I want people to shoot me" always just translates in my head as "Don't shoot me".
Numbers I still find hard to read due to their inexperience and basically I just want to, repeat my earlier position of that I am happy for them to still be alive for a few days because:
a) Presumably they'll have talked more
b) If they live that long then it's hard to believe their completely unprovoked day one claim of useful town power role
So uh, I guess that's a poisoned chalice there buddy because the only way I'll easily trust you since making that claim is if you get killed for making it. Oops!
I like x/Acio more now that they're not Acio because my brain turns off when I read any of Acio's posts, in that they're playing the game of someone who knows how to play mafia while I am playing the game of a loud dumbass who is good at looking like he knows something about things.
These posts seem pretty logical, nothing to really note about them that incriminates Jacq, and previous posts by Jacq have made me pretty sure they're Town.
Show Content
Airey's Posts
(09-10-2018, 08:46 PM)Airey Wrote: » (09-10-2018, 03:37 PM)x1372 Wrote: »@Airey
Look, you've said a lot of things today. Things that don't mesh with what others are saying in a way that makes you look bad. You also seemed to be focusing way more on a serial killer answer than seems prudent, though you ARE claiming you got shot at by what you think is a SK. And finally, you just made a claim that, if true, seems INCREDIBLY anti-town to have revealed publicly. Since you're already at soft lynch, I'm sure you wouldn't mind answering a few questions .
1) Given that they seem to contradict you, do you now believe that one or both of coldblooded and jacquerel are scum? If just one, which and why?
2) If you DID get shot by a serial killer before... whatever blood thing occurred, why are you claiming it?
3) You just claimed bomb. If it's true and everyone believed it, scum will no longer target you. This completely defeats the purpose of your role itself. Why make that claim, instead of just announcing that you were targeted?
4) Would you like to take a second stab at a role claim? If so, what were you hoping to gain out of the bomb claim?
6) You are voting for Solaris on assumption of being a Serial Killer. I stated earlier that I very strongly disagree with hunting for a SK at this juncture. Do you disagree with my logic on that? If so, please explain why I'm wrong.
1.) Neither are scum to me, i think something shenanigans is going on because if i didnt survive because of the blood then something saved me and the sk.
2/3/4.) So my role has two parts, now that my bomb has gone off i no longer have it so i am shit out of luck, didnt want to say it but i feel like i have to explain it now, so for my other part i would rather not go into that as i might have to end up using it.
6.) ok so you logic is solid, it makes 100% sense but referring to 2/3/4 my bomb was meant for sk and sk alone. for reasons i need sk dead, like yesterday.
(09-11-2018, 08:21 PM)Airey Wrote: »So I am pretty much an Amnesiac with a bomb, my biggest issue now and the reason i claimed is because my bomb went off and did not kill my killer and now i no longer have said bomb and the only way for me to win is with the siren being lynched. you say removing a 3p is a net positive for the town is kind of a laugh in my face as that is what iv been saying all along in wanting to kill the sk.
also perhaps the biggest reason not to bother lynching me is that i am dead to siren tonight anyway after me claiming walrus and getting town to lynch who i think the sk is, is for sure not going to happen so i am more or less a dead man with a paper mache walrus mask walking.
(09-09-2018, 09:50 PM)Airey Wrote: » (09-09-2018, 03:52 AM)Robust Laser Wrote: »what did i miss that confirmed jacq town (09-09-2018, 08:26 PM)Airey Wrote: »So not saying the blood is related to me or anything but someone did try to shoot me last night only to fail. I kind of had it coming but still a dick move.
eating my breakfast and doing a quick work related task and then will read thread (09-09-2018, 08:48 PM)Palamedes Wrote: »So Jaq was targeted by mafia, cool.
Ok so either Sol was just assuming Jaq was the mafia target before i said i was attacked last night OR he knew i was attacked last night cause he is the SK like i have been saying all along and he targeted me last night not knowing it wouldn't work.
Vote: Solaris
So under the assumption that the mafia did not target me since i have not made myself look good and seeing as how w/e the blood is saved? both me and jaq has not given us much information to work off. all i have is its pretty much confirmed sk targeted me while mafia targeted jaq. and some shitty reads.
Solaris - SK and wants me dead.
So this all really screams "Don't lynch me pleeeeease" and "Focus on the SK not me" and it's annoying.
1. We have no idea who the SK is, and you aren't backing up your guess of who it is either.
2. Why would you even say you were a bomb, rather than are a bomb? That way, you at least wouldn't be nightkilled by the SK, nor anybody else, for that matter, giving you time to attempt to convince everyone to lynch the SK.
3. Given that you are what you say you are, why would you actively declare this? That, as you can see, has drained all your power to affect lynches.
4. You are trying as hard as possible to defend youself, and are looking squirmy.
5. You are derailing horribly from getting rid of Scum and Mafia.
6. Why even roleclaim if it isn't Town? That just serves to put yourself under scrutiny, which is bad for anything but Town.
Because of all of this, I will switch vote to Airey. At worst, it'll be a wasted lynch. At best, it's a scum lynch.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Solaris - 09-12-2018
what do you think about granolaman
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - beruru - 09-12-2018
(09-11-2018, 12:06 PM)Solaris Wrote: »beru do you have opinions on stuff that doesn't have to do with airey or nola? ty
before i checked the thread i only had opinions of granola so it's a 100% increase in Having Reads
i guess i have "the absence of opinions" on like. some people who i think are town so i haven't been using brain energy on them (x1372 schaz cb pala sai blazer-replacement-person sol (and jac now i guess???)) which is a decent towncore mb. just murder everyone who isn't that. also dont murder me.
im just trying to concentrate on ppl i think are wolfy because i do not, actually, have the time to be here
which is a much nicer way to put "i'm just going to tunnel granola until i have the time and/or energy to play properly, lul"
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Solaris - 09-12-2018
good to know! thanks
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Lordlyhour - 09-12-2018
Whoa, It turns Out a Couple Of Hours translates to basically a whole Day when unexpected Business Drops Itself On Your Lap.Sorry Folks, That cut my rereading time down Just A Bit, So I Didn't get it all done. In the interests of Being timely about it, and with the threat Of Becoming a Lurker, I'm going to drop my hat into the
Vote: Airey
Pile and open the floor up for questions, if you want to ask them.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Airey - 09-12-2018
Well one off being hammered, this isn't good.
guess this is a better time then any.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Solaris - 09-12-2018
unvote
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Sai - 09-12-2018
(09-12-2018, 12:39 AM)beruru Wrote: »i guess i have "the absence of opinions" on like. some people who i think are town so i haven't been using brain energy on them (x1372 schaz cb pala sai blazer-replacement-person sol (and jac now i guess???)) which is a decent towncore mb. just murder everyone who isn't that. also dont murder me. Why do you think that Schaz is town?
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Sai - 09-12-2018
(09-11-2018, 07:47 PM)x1372 Wrote: »Well. I've been mulling things over in a very incorrect possibility space it seems then. Apparently some things never change. I guess I can roll back my worries about the probability of a delayed-death scenario or coldblooded pulling something super sneaky.
I guess I was treating the conversation bits between Jacquerel and Coldblooded as more fluff than substance. If that's not the case, and what happened did count as a kill in some regard, well, some of my other assumptions are out the window and need major review. It also means that, assuming Airey was lying, whatever attack killed scum night 1 could have even been a one-shot power. That said, the odds of Airey lying about role but having bulletproof have also risen substantially.
@Coldblooded, gotcha, I recognized your avatar but hadn't put it together without the matching name. On one hand, I suspect you ARE the sort who could pull off a scum gambit like that, but with the mechanical handshake with jacquerel it seems far less likely than I'd previously considered.
As for the Blazer/Lordy claim thing being bad for scum. In general, yes. In a vacuum, yes. But a gambit like they claimed could work out just fine if we never get around to testing or confirming it, and well, I don't think they actually gained more than one vote from that before things move from Blazer vs aC (admittedly somewhat one-sided) to just aC with a lot of mechanical discussion. And Blazer could have been planning to change their claim under the guise of provoking reactions later as well, but never had to. I've seen both town and scum pull similar tricks in other games, although I can't speak to the success rate of either.
I guess maybe that's just my own theories and feelings about these sorts of games coming out. I have a tendency to be suspect of most claims, contested or not, when they don't come with immediate information that influences the town's decision making regarding players other than the claimant. Hence why, despite my paranoia earlier, I feel much better about coldblooded's claim now than about the vengeful claim from yesterday.
@Jacquerel I suppose it's possible but it just looks WEIRD to me that we now have multiple people postulating 0 or 1 scum on what was functionally a d1 townie lynch as far as votals go. Definitely possible, but just seems weird. I'm leaning scum on tehpilot and very slightly scum on robust laser, but you could very well be right.
@Airey You're claiming 3rd party. With powers. And a not-completely-town agenda. Yes, killing a serial killer (if there is one, I'm still not totally convinced) is technically pro-town but... that's the sort of claim that scum could hide behind. Especially if you, like legendaryQ, had a one-shot bulletproof. Do you have... well, anything else to convince the town that you shouldn't be today's lynch? I don't want to be presumptuous, but unless something major changes you're getting lynched today. Even if you're telling the truth, removing a 3p is still a net positive for town. And that un-retracted bomb claim actually somehow managed to sound worse with clarification.
Mechanics aside, do you not actually have a townread on both CB and Jacq?
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Mirdini - 09-12-2018
Monster Votal
Airey - 7 (TehPilot, Coldblooded, Granolaman, Jacquerel, Robust Laser, Numbers, LordlyHour)
TehPilot - 2 (x1372, Palamedes)
Granolaman - 2 (Sai, beruru)
Numbers - 1 (Schazer)
Not The Author - 1 (seedy)
Solaris - 1 (Airey)
Schazer - 1 (Not The Author)
Abstaining - 2 (SleepingOrange, Solaris)
With 17 players alive it takes 9 votes to hard lynch, and 5 votes to soft lynch. Day ends in 34 hours, at 5pm CET on Thursday, September 13.
Day End Countdown
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Airey - 09-12-2018
Much better
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Not The Author - 09-12-2018
here I am trying to formulate actual theories on who's what while trying to suppress the ones based on raw humor-factor and how much deens is willing to meme on us
and then this happens.
thanks.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Airey - 09-12-2018
(09-12-2018, 06:18 AM)Not The Author Wrote: »here I am trying to formulate actual theories on who's what while trying to suppress the ones based on raw humor-factor and how much deens is willing to meme on us
and then this happens.
thanks.
Your welcome, now lets get back to lynching either the sk or scum.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Not The Author - 09-12-2018
you're welcome to elaborate on whether or not this was your doing, or whatever the specific way this thing works Is, or whatever. like I think I see what's meant to be happening, but I'd rather head off What The Fuck Is Going On!!!!! posts with info from the source so we can, in fact, do just that
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Not The Author - 09-12-2018
you can also not do that, of course; what's the point of chaos if you're just gonna neatly order it after the fact, but. you know.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Not The Author - 09-12-2018
Though at the very least one thing that would be good to know: Is TehPilot actually at softlynch right now? That's not a formatting error, right?
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Robust Laser - 09-12-2018
what the hell even.
Unvote
Vote: Granolaman I guess? I mean like, I don't specifically think TehPilot must be innocent but if we're forced at soft (???) I might as well push it in the direction I was feeling supportive of??
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Robust Laser - 09-12-2018
I wonder if airey no longer has softlynch then the runner up no longer counts as that, if that's what this means. Or if this is just diversionary.
what even and why
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Coldblooded - 09-12-2018
No, come on, don't reward Airey for this shit.
Notice how the abstaining list is also invisible and that the soft lynch counter hasn't moved? I'm guessing this is just a votal formatting change and nothing else.
IMO we should just hard lynch Airey and then move on to someone else only if that doesn't work.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Jacquerel - 09-12-2018
I’m in support of this plan please vote Airey and then if he doesn’t get hammered we can kill someone else.
The votals don’t say I’m not voting, and I’ve contributed to at least one bastard thing with a fake modpost before (though if this was a “make dini say something” thing, think the formatting would be less weird).
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Robust Laser - 09-12-2018
My money's on a hard lynch triggering a hammer against the runner up. It just not causing a hammer is possible, I suppose. I'm not sure I believe this is just aesthetic but it'd be real rude if it is. Man I don't know.
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Coldblooded - 09-12-2018
Actually the ideal would probably be to hard lynch Airey while also leaving someone else at 5 votes as an emergency backup, but that would require at least 80% of the playerlist to actually be engaged with the game and not just sitting on pointless one-off wagons that they know aren't going anywhere.
Dare we dream?
RE: The Wander Island Incident - Day Three: A Bloody Mystery [17/21] - Robust Laser - 09-12-2018
Vote: Airey I guess if anything this is a test of if Airey can still be voted for in general?
|