(04-25-2016, 12:02 AM)Wheat Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 11:11 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 11:07 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This post has the number 8 and the letter Q.

This post fails rules 2, 3, 4 and 5.

wOW!

YOU'RE IN FUCK CITY

• and
  
• you're
  
• never
  
• leaving
  

[CODE]

(04-25-2016, 12:45 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »and i didn't fall for your trick also

(04-25-2016, 01:23 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »

(04-25-2016, 12:45 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »and i didn't fall for your trick also

(04-25-2016, 01:29 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »I was going to post an actual video, but then I couldn't think of one.

(04-25-2016, 02:12 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #4.

Do we just start spamming complete nonsense until we accidentally pass rule 5? 'cause that's what it looks like we're going to have to do...

End of message.

(05-17-2015, 04:02 AM)Sai Wrote: »You have been tricked.

The wool has been pulled over your eyes. You have been double dealt and played for a fool. Whether you have been swindled or misled, bamboozled or hoodwinked, the fact remains that you have been taken in and taken for a ride. Someone has deceived you, defrauded you, and deluded you by linking you to this thread. You believed that you were being linked to one thing, but instead you have been linked here. It was this thread to which you have been linked instead of the website that you thought that you were visiting. The reason for this is that you have been caught and thrown by a hoax.

Whether you feel flabbergasted by how you've been flimflammed or dumbfounded by how you've been duped, rocked by how you've been rooked or confounded by how you've been conned, now that you've been outwitted into visiting this thread, you must post to admit that you have been set up and had one put over you.

(04-25-2016, 02:17 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

(04-25-2016, 02:12 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #4.

Do we just start spamming complete nonsense until we accidentally pass rule 5? 'cause that's what it looks like we're going to have to do...

End of message.

Fails rules 2, 3 and 5.

I guess making some random guesses would be a start

(04-25-2016, 12:02 AM)Wheat Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 11:11 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 11:07 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This post has the number 8 and the letter Q.

This post fails rules 2, 3, 4 and 5.

wOW!

YOU'RE IN FUCK CITY

• and
  
• you're
  
• never
  
• leaving
  

[CODE]

(04-25-2016, 02:17 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

(04-25-2016, 02:12 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #4.

Do we just start spamming complete nonsense until we accidentally pass rule 5? 'cause that's what it looks like we're going to have to do...

End of message.

Fails rules 2, 3 and 5.

I guess making some random guesses would be a start

(04-25-2016, 02:16 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test 5.

This post breaks rule 5.

End of message.

(04-25-2016, 02:20 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »

(05-17-2015, 04:02 AM)Sai Wrote: »You have been tricked.

The wool has been pulled over your eyes. You have been double dealt and played for a fool. Whether you have been swindled or misled, bamboozled or hoodwinked, the fact remains that you have been taken in and taken for a ride. Someone has deceived you, defrauded you, and deluded you by linking you to this thread. You believed that you were being linked to one thing, but instead you have been linked here. It was this thread to which you have been linked instead of the website that you thought that you were visiting. The reason for this is that you have been caught and thrown by a hoax.

Whether you feel flabbergasted by how you've been flimflammed or dumbfounded by how you've been duped, rocked by how you've been rooked or confounded by how you've been conned, now that you've been outwitted into visiting this thread, you must post to admit that you have been set up and had one put over you.

(04-25-2016, 02:21 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: » g0m

(04-25-2016, 02:22 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »

(04-25-2016, 12:02 AM)Wheat Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 11:11 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

(04-24-2016, 11:07 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This post has the number 8 and the letter Q.

This post fails rules 2, 3, 4 and 5

wOW!

YOU'RE IN FUCK CITY

• and
  
• you're
  
• never
  
• leaving
  

[CODE]

(04-25-2016, 02:17 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

(04-25-2016, 02:12 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #4.

Do we just start spamming complete nonsense until we accidentally pass rule 5? 'cause that's what it looks like we're going to have to do...

End of message.

Fails rules 2, 3 and 5.

I guess making some random guesses would be a start

(04-25-2016, 02:23 AM)Sruixan Wrote: »This is test #6.

I regret provoking that hint because I was about to go to bed.

End of message.

OTTO Wrote:

(04-24-2016, 06:17 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Rule 3: Must include the number of rules broken other than this one somewhere in the post. Numerals of any kind count, as do the words. So do "first", "second", "third", "fourth". "to" and "too" do not, tags don't. Individual digits of larger numbers do; however, I didn't apply this to Roman numerals.

This means a post that passes all rules must have a zero.

Content Removed By user

(04-25-2016, 02:32 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Rule five is something you could figure out given a couple of examples I think rule one is potentially going to be trickier

(04-24-2016, 10:07 PM)earthexe Wrote: »13. i guess we're supposed to have some kind of words at the very least.

OTTO Wrote:

(04-24-2016, 06:17 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Rule 3: Must include the number of rules broken other than this one somewhere in the post. Numerals of any kind count, as do the words. So do "first", "second", "third", "fourth". "to" and "too" do not, tags don't. Individual digits of larger numbers do; however, I didn't apply this to Roman numerals.

This means a post that passes all rules must have a zero.

Content Removed By user

(04-25-2016, 03:16 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »

OTTO Wrote:

(04-24-2016, 06:17 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Rule 3: Must include the number of rules broken other than this one somewhere in the post. Numerals of any kind count, as do the words. So do "first", "second", "third", "fourth". "to" and "too" do not, tags don't. Individual digits of larger numbers do; however, I didn't apply this to Roman numerals.

This means a post that passes all rules must have a zero.

Content Removed By user

No I couldn't have, it was rules broken other than Rule 3.

I wonder if Rule 5 this round has something to do with number of words/characters.

(04-25-2016, 03:22 AM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »

(04-25-2016, 03:16 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »

OTTO Wrote:

(04-24-2016, 06:17 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Rule 3: Must include the number of rules broken other than this one somewhere in the post. Numerals of any kind count, as do the words. So do "first", "second", "third", "fourth". "to" and "too" do not, tags don't. Individual digits of larger numbers do; however, I didn't apply this to Roman numerals.

This means a post that passes all rules must have a zero.

Content Removed By user

No I couldn't have, it was rules broken other than Rule 3.

I wonder if Rule 5 this round has something to do with number of words/characters.

This post fails rule 5.