Eagle Time
Things, and no context. - Printable Version

+- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org)
+-- Forum: Chat (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Forum: General Chatter (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Things, and no context. (/showthread.php?tid=214)



RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 01-31-2016

Probably not


RE: Things, and no context. - Kíeros - 02-02-2016

Quote:Have you ever wondered why we don't turn into chickens when we eat scrambled eggs?

Quote:I think algorithms are made from the ghosts of innocent dead babies



RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-02-2016

lunch-official Wrote:
hommedog Wrote:
lunch-official Wrote:
nmqttps Wrote:
lunch-official Wrote:i work as a barista & people tell me all the time that The Drinks Got Gender. Thats A Lady Coffee, people try to say

its fucking bean water

can’t believe i can’t just reply to this but: maybe they’re actually telling you that this coffee has an important status. Lady Coffee

oh shit i was in the presence of bean water royalty oh fuck i must have looked like such a rube. such a fool.

what the fuck does this post mean ive been trying to decipher its hieroglyphic encrypted message but i cant

“From a deconstructionist stand point, I have to disagree with a large portion of the customers that I, a humble barista tend to each day. The assertion that certain coffee drinks are more suitable for one gender or another is folly. For as we know: 1. gender is a social construct, & 2. coffee of any type is simply hot water strained through roasted beans, & has no greater affect on either culturally assigned sex.”

“What ho, kind friend! Is it not unfortunate that I cannot simply reply to this post, & most reblog it? What a farce, this blue website! Ah, but I digress: what if perhaps your customers were not asserting not the suitability of the drink for a given gender, but rather indicating some matter of status? Perhaps the coffee is possessing of a high rank in society. This is of course my purely grammatical viewpoint on the subject.”

“Oh, damnation! This does in fact seem much more likely than my own ludicrous assumptions, & I was no doubt in the presence of roasted bean royalty! Some emissary from foreign soil! Curses! What a country bumpkin I’ve made myself out to be!!”



RE: Things, and no context. - wooiljung - 02-02-2016

[Image: original.gif]

Oops, too much context


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-03-2016

[Image: tumblr_o1xglqGWyq1qd4q8ao1_500.gif]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-03-2016

[Image: tumblr_nozdr7ixX61qjyfteo1_250.gif]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-04-2016

[Image: tumblr_moyzl9gMhN1s2qf45o1_500.jpg]

((I post way too often in this thread and have zero restraint))


RE: Things, and no context. - Plaid - 02-04-2016

No its good, keep it up


RE: Things, and no context. - Kíeros - 02-04-2016

Everyone <3< Spam Filter


RE: Things, and no context. - ICan'tGiveCredit - 02-04-2016

[Image: eOverid.gif]


RE: Things, and no context. - OTTO - 02-04-2016

You must be registered to view this content.


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-04-2016

[Image: tumblr_inline_n2v1qaVT9a1rktm31.png]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-04-2016

[Image: tumblr_o0y4ip9Z9c1rf77llo1_540.png]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-04-2016

[Image: tumblr_o1xh62iFwk1rc7zl1o1_400.gif]


RE: Things, and no context. - Kíeros - 02-04-2016

OTTO Wrote:
(02-04-2016, 05:17 AM)Kíeros Wrote: »Everyone <3< Spam Filter
Content Removed By user

I know, and that line needs no context whatsoever. Honestly, I could put half [CONTEXT CENSORED] and it would fit. Like:

Kíeros Wrote:*slams gavel down* *so tired that I miss the target and hit my knee* *reflexively kick and knock over the table* Great...
Kíeros Wrote:whee im having so much fun that i forgot to capitalise or punctuate
Kíeros Wrote:IT'S THE RETURN OF THE BLASÉ REACTIONS TO THIS FORM!
Kíeros Wrote:OTL. No, that's not an emoticon, that's Ontotheological. I have no clue how that relates, but that's in my notes for my next class that I'm going over now, so it goes on here.
Kíeros Wrote:Who likes these? *crickets* I CAN'T HEAR YOU *more crickets*



RE: Things, and no context. - ICan'tGiveCredit - 02-04-2016

[Image: beets-by-dre.jpg]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-04-2016

[Image: tumblr_inline_nd9qix0VfH1qblidh.jpg]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-04-2016

[Image: tumblr_mnebtbmx4d1r5piyjo1_540.png]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-05-2016

A message.


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-05-2016

... /// ...


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-05-2016

[Image: tumblr_o1xsguJw6B1rves7ho2_540.jpg]


RE: Things, and no context. - a52 - 02-05-2016

(02-02-2016, 04:29 AM)Kíeros Wrote: »
Quote:I think algorithms are made from the ghosts of innocent dead babies

I am a computer scientist and I can confirm this 100%.


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-06-2016

[Image: tumblr_inline_mqkbjjq2UN1qz4rgp.png]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-06-2016

[Image: tumblr_n9sickY0FC1s5cyzso1_540.jpg]


RE: Things, and no context. - Reyweld - 02-06-2016

[Image: tumblr_nsclojhRD21rhdp6mo7_540.jpg]