Eagle Time
Post making contest 5.0 - Printable Version

+- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Forum: Adventures and Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30)
+---- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Thread: Post making contest 5.0 (/showthread.php?tid=2238)



RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

time to get to post 10000?


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

My favourite part of the alphabet is the part that looks like Sruix vs two Sruix clones in a no holds barred death match (and I'm there cheering them on).


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

CHOO CHOO


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

time to get post 9999


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

Guys, I already won with my last post, it's time to start a new round.


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

Coup ruleset 2: electric boogaloo


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 01:44 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Guys, I already won with my last post, it's time to start a new round.

okay cool.

well if nobody else is willing to step up to the plate I'll do a ruleset.

This post passes rules i and e


RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 08-08-2016

Clarification: I was a little lenient when it came to judging rule 4 last night. Having gone back through the thread, I don't think I would strip any of the posts which passed it of said pass, but it's worth bearing in mind that what made me make those posts pass rule 4 is unlikely to work in a winning post. I am probably going to start leaning towards the less generous side with my rule 4 judgements... and yet, regardless of how I judge the following, I can promise you that the results would be the same...

(08-08-2016, 01:25 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »time to get to post 10000?

This post doesn't quite pass rule 4 and it definitely doesn't pass any others.

(08-08-2016, 01:31 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »My favourite part of the alphabet is the part that looks like Sruix vs two Sruix clones in a no holds barred death match (and I'm there cheering them on).

This post passes no rules.

(08-08-2016, 01:31 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »CHOO CHOO

This post passes no rules.

(08-08-2016, 01:32 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »time to get post 9999

This post passes no rules.

(08-08-2016, 01:33 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Guys, I already won with my last post, it's time to start a new round.

This post passes no rules.

(08-08-2016, 01:33 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »Coup ruleset 2: electric boogaloo

This post passes no rules.

(08-08-2016, 01:34 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
(08-08-2016, 01:44 AM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Guys, I already won with my last post, it's time to start a new round.

okay cool.

well if nobody else is willing to step up to the plate I'll do a ruleset.

This post passes rules i and e

This post is just as irritating with regards to rule 1 as it used to be, but it fails to pass it or any other rule.


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

Quote:Ixcaliber - Today at 2:44 PM
i'm confused
Sruixan - Today at 2:44 PM
by the fact that posts have stopped passing rule 4?
Ixcaliber - Today at 2:45 PM
by your paragraph which is like 'i was too lenient so i'm gonna be more strict but everything that passed four still passed and i'd still judge them the same but here they are again judged differently'
i'm getting mixed signals
Sruixan - Today at 2:45 PM
that's understandable
okay I decided to let something pass that wasn't entirely explicit in my wording for rule four based on the fact that I wrote it out very quickly
and now this morning I have put it in the wording perhaps a little stricter than I was thinking last night
Ixcaliber - Today at 2:47 PM
can you unpass that?
can you judge everything by the same standard even if you unpass things that already passed
consistency is important
Sruixan - Today at 2:48 PM
but conveniently everything that passed rule 4 last night still passes this reworded rule 4, and nothing that didn't pass rule 4 would be able to pass even now



RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

01100011 01101000 01101111 01110000


RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 01:50 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
Quote:Ixcaliber - Today at 2:44 PM
i'm confused
Sruixan - Today at 2:44 PM
by the fact that posts have stopped passing rule 4?
Ixcaliber - Today at 2:45 PM
by your paragraph which is like 'i was too lenient so i'm gonna be more strict but everything that passed four still passed and i'd still judge them the same but here they are again judged differently'
i'm getting mixed signals
Sruixan - Today at 2:45 PM
that's understandable
okay I decided to let something pass that wasn't entirely explicit in my wording for rule four based on the fact that I wrote it out very quickly
and now this morning I have put it in the wording perhaps a little stricter than I was thinking last night
Ixcaliber - Today at 2:47 PM
can you unpass that?
can you judge everything by the same standard even if you unpass things that already passed
consistency is important
Sruixan - Today at 2:48 PM
but conveniently everything that passed rule 4 last night still passes this reworded rule 4, and nothing that didn't pass rule 4 would be able to pass even now

This might have passed rule 2, but nope. None of the other rules are passed.

(08-08-2016, 01:53 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »01100011 01101000 01101111 01110000

This post is hilarious but passes no rules.


EE: eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee - Reyweld - 08-08-2016

eeeee


RE: EE: eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee - Sruixan - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 04:28 PM)Reyweld Wrote: »eeeee

This post is somewhat in the spirit of rule 2, but it doesn't pass it nor any of the others.


RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 08-08-2016

This post is hilarious but passes no rules.


RE: Post making contest - Dragon Fogel - 08-08-2016

Fact Seagull g0m


RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 06:19 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »This post is hilarious but passes no rules.

This post passes rule 1 5!

(08-08-2016, 06:20 PM)Dragon Fogel Wrote: »Fact Seagull g0m

This post passes no rules!


FF: fffff - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

fffff


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

[Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png]


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

[Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png]


RE: Post making contest - Reyweld - 08-08-2016

[Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png][Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png][Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png][Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png]



RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 06:28 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »fffff

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 06:33 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »[Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png]

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 06:33 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »[Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png]

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 07:38 PM)Reyweld Wrote: »
[Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png][Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png][Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png][Image: two_zpsrw3vn05k.png][Image: one_zpsql5fstyx.png]

This post passes rule 4!


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke


RE: Post making contest - Ixcaliber - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!


RE: Post making contest - Sruixan - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:42 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

This post passes rule 5!


RE: Post making contest - qwerx3 - 08-08-2016

(08-08-2016, 09:44 PM)Sruixan Wrote: »
(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:42 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »
(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

(08-08-2016, 09:14 PM)Ixcaliber Wrote: »i'm disappointed i had to explain my pinary chop joke

This post passes no rules!

This post passes rule 5!