+- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org)
+-- Forum: BAWK BAWK (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: Hell-place, Ontario (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=21)
+--- Thread: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition (/showthread.php?tid=1517)
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - OTTO - 04-29-2016
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - btp - 04-29-2016
WOAH LOOK AT ALL THESE SHINY NEW RULES
Here were them counts.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - Granolaman - 04-29-2016
THAT'S PRETTY AWESOME BUT CAN YOU ADD THE WORDING OF THE PROP TO NOTES ATTACHED TO THEIR NAMES? I WANNA VOTE ON SOME OF THESE BUT I'M TOO LAZY TO TRAWL THROUGH ALL THESE TYPING QUIRKS TO FIND THEM
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - a52 - 04-29-2016
ye2 on liineup
prop grammer: all users must refer to them2elve2 iin the thiird per2on
prop lapd: "poliice offiicer2" can be elected that are authoriized to deliiver punii2hment2 to rule-breaker2, but are otherwii2e the 2ame a2 ordiinary u2er2.
(ii've changed back two 2ollux 2o that people can read my propo2iitiion2)
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - OTTO - 04-29-2016
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - SleepingOrange - 04-29-2016
No on grammar
Yes on lap8===D
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - a52 - 04-29-2016
two btp tiicket2 on grammar
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - Jacquerel - 04-29-2016
no on grammer
i still havent chosen a typing quirk but i'll get around to it
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - OTTO - 04-29-2016
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - a52 - 04-29-2016
OTTO Wrote:(04-29-2016, 05:51 PM)a52 Wrote: »two btp tiicket2 on grammarContent Removed By user
let the pant2 2ock2 deciide
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - Jacquerel - 04-29-2016
![[Image: BlizzGM.png]](https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/51926430/WoW/BlizzGM.png)
[Chwoka]: The recipient of a [username] TICKET may redeem one Ticket for one YES vote on any proposition. [Chwoka]: A YES vote created by a redeemed [username] TICKET counts as one YES vote by [username]. [Jacquerel]: Seems pretty clear cut to me.
[Jacquerel]: It counts as much as me voting yes twice for something would, that meaning... once.
[Jacquerel]: Also I'm changing my vote to Yes on Grammer because of my new typing quirk.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - OrangeAipom - 04-29-2016
ProPoSiTion GarMents Squared: Pants Is StricKen From Rule 6 As Well And RePlaced With Socks
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - btp - 04-29-2016
SCANDAL!
bigro: not a rule
bigro is a rule through.
Edit:
After reviewing the current propositions it has been determined that PROP 9: MOVE LOATHER DATE SIM TO IMPORTANT THREADS has received 3 votes and is awaiting action.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - Farewell - 04-29-2016
prop mily: i am subhuman and unable to vote
yes on mily
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - OrangeAipom - 04-29-2016
Yes on mily
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - btp - 04-29-2016
(04-29-2016, 11:03 PM)Farewell Wrote: »prop mily: i am subhuman and unable to vote
yes on mily
yes on mily.
MILY PASSES. FAREWELL IS UNABLE TO VOTE.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - btp - 04-29-2016
OTTO Wrote:(04-29-2016, 05:51 PM)a52 Wrote: »two btp tiicket2 on grammarContent Removed By user
I'm not the socks but yes, you used your 2 btp tickets to make me vote yes twice on prop grammar.
No refunds! Easy mistake, though.
Edit: So here are two more.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - Jacquerel - 04-29-2016
[Jacquerel]: I'm voting yes on TICKETS to further cement its legality.
[Jacquerel]: And absolutely not for any bribery or voter fraud related reasons.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - OTTO - 04-30-2016
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - OTTO - 04-30-2016
You must be registered to view this content.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - Jacquerel - 04-30-2016
[Jacquerel]: Reviewing rules I think are useful to have and shouldn't be repealed I'm also throwing a protective Yes on Effort.
[Jacquerel]: Needs to be some encouragement for people to make topics other than this one really.
>> To [ ]: Also while it's a good idea to practice I guess, I don't think the third person rule is in the rules topic yet, so it's not yet technically in practice.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - Jacquerel - 04-30-2016
[Jacquerel]: Whoop never mind, it's in there now. I guess that Jacquerel was just slightly too slow.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - btp - 04-30-2016
Just a reminder, all rules are still propositions that can be voted yea or nay on. If a rule drops below 3 total, it is removed from the ruleset.
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - ☆ C.H.W.O.K.A ☆ - 04-30-2016
no on lineup, my connection is too poor to see it
RE: dark subforum ideas thread: xxx edition - btp - 04-30-2016
Quote:beestpand that is what btp did.
okay so there is a way to make this forum list but it is in fact
a huge pain
so how about
we downvote Lineup
so it doesn't have to be there
but I can still update it from time to time
no on lineup
but btp will try and keep the spreadsheet updated regardless