+- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org)
+-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25)
+--- Forum: Adventures and Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=30)
+---- Forum: Forum Games (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=32)
+---- Thread: Tropefia - A PYP - N5: Downed Guy (11/24) (need replacement) (/showthread.php?tid=479)
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Romythered - 05-18-2013
THEY'RE DEAAAAAAAD
THEY'RE ALLLLL DEAAAAAAAAD
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Purple Walrus - 05-18-2013
No were not.
Vote:red
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - ICan'tGiveCredit - 05-18-2013
unvote. Vote: Mathgirl for learning the foul magiks of mathematics and causing mayhem in the universe.
"Integrals? What kind of a skill is that?"
"It's the kind where you EXPLODE!"
-boom-
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Kíeros - 05-18-2013
Voting for math? Come on! You should know better than that!
Vote: Credit
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Scoffles - 05-18-2013
(05-18-2013, 12:01 PM)Purple Walrus Wrote: »No were not.
Vote:red
Vote: Purple Walrus
What is this shit
We're like halfway to lynching Red and nobody's even /said/ anything
Except Pilot
I guess
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Romythered - 05-18-2013
pilot hasn't actually said anything except LOL IM NOT GRANNY LOL, tho
I really don't know what the fuck is up with the votes on me though
is it still Four or is it three
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - 2create - 05-18-2013
I'll be busy tomorrow and I'm not sure if I'll be able to make a peust.
If I don't, do not be alarmed. I will be back on Monday.
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - SupahKiven - 05-18-2013
Yeah, why are we lynching Red? I'm going to agree with Scoffles here and Vote: Purple Walrus cause that vote looked bad.
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Purple Walrus - 05-18-2013
Oh shit, we're playing for real now. Well, that was more of a silly/bandwagon vote then anything based on any real fact.
Unvote
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - yd12k - 05-18-2013
That was a terrible response in everyway vote: purplewalrus
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - ICan'tGiveCredit - 05-18-2013
(05-18-2013, 08:21 PM)yd12k Wrote: »That was a terrible response in everyway vote: purplewalrus
Well yeah I guess it's been 2 pages since day started.
Mathgirl's crimes against this existential plane must be held off for now.
There is a new Purple scourge.
unvote. Vote: The Walrus
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - 2create - 05-18-2013
I'll have to agree with.... no, wait.
I'm not convinced. I'll only cast a lynch veute if needed, but bandwagoning on a bandwagoner is not the best, feur a reason named hypocricy. Also, we do need a lynch at ze end of ze day.
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - calibornio - 05-18-2013
So PurpleWalrus thought it was still RVS and that automatically makes him scum? I mean, I guess it could be seen as him bandwagoning on Red, but it still seemed very much like a random vote. And now you guys are joining the Purple Walrus wagon. Scoffles and Kiven didn't look too scummy, but yd12k voted based on the "terrible response" where PW took back his vote. What was so bad about that response?
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - ICan'tGiveCredit - 05-18-2013
unvote. vote: cali for not understanding my ironic vote.
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - frigidScholar - 05-18-2013
Well, partly because he admitted it was a bandwagon vote which are never good and also because he really seems like he's trying to backpedal to try to save face.
I guess he's lynch target number 1 right now, but I don't really feel like that fully puts him into scum territory. If it does get down to it, I guess I'd be okay with the lynch but now I'm getting suspicious of Cali for defending PW so much.
@ Cali: Why aren't you letting PW defend himself?
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - calibornio - 05-18-2013
Because he defended himself by taking back the vote (or at least I thought he did) and people were still voting him. And I just really don't trust bandwagons after RVS is over unless they have a good amount of evidence to back things up. Also, I'm not really sure if we're still in RVS because most people are voting seriously atm, but some people are still doing silly votes.
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - konec0 - 05-18-2013
(05-18-2013, 06:09 AM)2create Wrote: »unveute; veute: konec0
(05-18-2013, 08:34 PM)2create Wrote: »I'm not convinced. I'll only cast a lynch veute if needed, but bandwagoning on a bandwagoner is not the best, feur a reason named hypocricy. Also, we do need a lynch at ze end of ze day.
apparently voting me was "needed" for some reason
gj mr poirot
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - konec0 - 05-18-2013
inb4 "trying to get people to talk" defense
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Romythered - 05-18-2013
so basically Cali, PW, and 2create - who needs to drop the typing quirk if possible that's really annoying to read - are lookin' odd
cal moreso than the other two for his super weird defense of walrus
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - Romythered - 05-18-2013
like dang whered that come from why are you defending him when he said "lol yeah I hopped on the wagon"
removing one's vote while saying "oh shit sorry I was bandwagoning" is the EXACT OPPOSITE of a defense...
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - calibornio - 05-18-2013
It's a reasonable excuse when your vote was meant to be random. I guess I think it's normal because I was involved in another mafia with a randavote bandwagon that came up because of name problems. And it probably still seemed like RVS to PW because you were still making silly posts. And why haven't the other members of the Redwagon been questioned? Did they stop posting or something?
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - frigidScholar - 05-19-2013
@Calibornio: Maybe name problems caused some to join the wagon, but I was in that game and 2 of the scum were on that wagon as well :P
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - frigidScholar - 05-19-2013
EBWOP: Also, deflecting much? Trying to shift scrutiny elsewhere is never a good sign.
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - calibornio - 05-19-2013
I am not deflecting. If I were deflecting I wouldn't have tried to defend PW. And it's less that I'm defending him and more that I'm questioning the people who joined his wagon. And his wagon seems more suspicious than Red's because Red's wagon was all or mostly randavotes. This does not put PW in the clear. If greater evidence than a Red randavote is provided, he might start to look like scum to me. He looks neutral to me atm. Also, 2 scum may have been on that wagon, but there were probably around 5-7 townies on it as well.
RE: Tropefia - A PYP -D1: For Realsies (24/24) - frigidScholar - 05-19-2013
You mean like... 2-3. There were only 12 people in that game, so if there were an additional 5 townies it would have been a hammer :P