Page topping contest - Printable Version +- Eagle Time (https://eagle-time.org) +-- Forum: Archive (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=25) +--- Forum: BAWK BAWK (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=34) +---- Forum: Hawkspace (https://eagle-time.org/forumdisplay.php?fid=35) +---- Thread: Page topping contest (/showthread.php?tid=1617) Pages:
1
2
|
Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 There are no secret rules. Whoever posts in page 2 first wins. RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 This post doesn't pass any of the rules. RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 Not with this post you're not. Come on, Shredded, get it together! RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 (05-15-2016, 07:56 PM)Jacquerel Wrote: »There's multiple options for how many posts to show per page, which one are we judging by? Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh My setting is 25 posts per page, so post #26 wins. Also this post broke EVERY rule RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - a52 - 05-15-2016 what if earthexe gets the page top RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 Also deleting posts is 100% legal RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 (05-15-2016, 08:00 PM)Jacquerel Wrote: »So you could see more posts before having to go to a new page (05-15-2016, 08:02 PM)a52 Wrote: »what if earthexe gets the page top OTTO Wrote:(05-15-2016, 08:02 PM)a52 Wrote: »what if earthexe gets the page topContent Removed By user (05-15-2016, 08:06 PM)earthexe Wrote: »Through my observations through how people interact on these forums and the fact that I have never changed these specific settings, a "page" for the purposes of this thread is 25 posts. So post 26 wins (05-15-2016, 08:06 PM)earthexe Wrote: »Also deleting posts is 100% legal None of these posts pass any rules! NONE! RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 Keep posting and maybe you'll find out! RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 We're on the home stretch. The heat is on. RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 RE: Page topping contest - OTTO - 05-15-2016 You must be registered to view this content. RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 (05-15-2016, 08:21 PM)Jacquerel Wrote: »Like nobody has won yet. How correct. Nobody HAS won yet. Not even this post of yours: It breaks every rule! RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 (05-15-2016, 08:14 PM)earthexe Wrote: »FOR THE LOVE OF GOD SOMEONE LOCK THE THREWAD (05-15-2016, 08:23 PM)Jacquerel Wrote: »I'm starting to run out of posts to delete, unfortunately. So am I, because of all the great goofs. But I can also just quote them to preserve them and further confuse future generations RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 Also I think We've deleted enough posts to make a new page altogether RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 And rapidly posting like this helps solidify my victory! Yes! RE: Page topping contest - Justice Watch - 05-15-2016 oh shit |